Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Allow KafkaRoller talk to controller directly (#10016)" from 0.45.x release #10944

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

tinaselenge
Copy link
Contributor

Type of change

Select the type of your PR

  • Bugfix

Description

This reverts commit 1f1a16d.

This commit caused Warning messages indicating that describeQuorum request was sent to a non active controller therefore failed rolling a controller-only node. We discovered that non active controller does not forward the request to the active controller like broker does, but returns NOT_LEADER_OR_FOLLOWER error. This issue gets resolved by itself eventually after retrying the request several times, because the describeQuorum gets sent to the active controller at some point. However, it could cause some delay in rolling controller-only nodes, due to the number of retrying.

Reverting this commit from 0.45.0 release branch, and the issue will be fixed properly in the main branch to target the next release.

Checklist

Please go through this checklist and make sure all applicable tasks have been done

  • Write tests
  • Make sure all tests pass
  • Update documentation
  • Check RBAC rights for Kubernetes / OpenShift roles
  • Try your changes from Pod inside your Kubernetes and OpenShift cluster, not just locally
  • Reference relevant issue(s) and close them after merging
  • Update CHANGELOG.md
  • Supply screenshots for visual changes, such as Grafana dashboards

This reverts commit 1f1a16d.

This commit caused Warning messages indicating that describeQuorum request was sent to a non active controller therefore failed rolling a controller-only node. We discovered that non active controller does not forward the request to the active controller like broker does, but returns NOT_LEADER_OR_FOLLOWER error. This issue gets resolved by itself eventually after retrying the request several times, because the describeQuorum gets sent to the active controller at some point. However, it could cause some delay in rolling controller-only nodes, due to the number of retrying.

Reverting this commit from 0.45.0 release branch, and the issue will be fixed properly in the main branch to target the next release.

Signed-off-by: Gantigmaa Selenge <[email protected]>
@tinaselenge tinaselenge changed the title Revert "Allow KafkaRoller talk to controller directly (#10016)" Revert "Allow KafkaRoller talk to controller directly (#10016)" from 0.45.x release Dec 12, 2024
Copy link
Member

@scholzj scholzj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM assuming the tests pass. Thanks

Copy link
Member

@ppatierno ppatierno left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM as well. Thanks Tina!

@ppatierno ppatierno added this to the 0.45.0 milestone Dec 12, 2024
@scholzj
Copy link
Member

scholzj commented Dec 12, 2024

/azp run regression

@scholzj
Copy link
Member

scholzj commented Dec 12, 2024

/azp run zookeeper-regression

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

1 similar comment
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@scholzj
Copy link
Member

scholzj commented Dec 12, 2024

/azp run zookeeper-regression

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@scholzj
Copy link
Member

scholzj commented Dec 12, 2024

/azp run regression

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@scholzj scholzj merged commit b506022 into strimzi:release-0.45.x Dec 12, 2024
27 checks passed
@tinaselenge tinaselenge deleted the revert-roller-change branch December 13, 2024 10:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants