-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Kernel] Update fused_moe tuning script for FP8 #4457
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
robertgshaw2-redhat
approved these changes
Apr 30, 2024
robertgshaw2-redhat
pushed a commit
to neuralmagic/nm-vllm
that referenced
this pull request
May 6, 2024
This PR updates the tuning script for the fused_moe kernel to support FP8 and also adds configurations for TP4. Note that for the configuration I removed num_warps and num_stages for small batch sizes since that improved performance and brought the benchmarks on par with the numbers before in that regime to make sure this is a strict improvement over the status quo. All the numbers below are for mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1, 1000 input and 50 output tokens. Before this PR (with static activation scaling): qps = 1: 9.8 ms ITL, 0.49s e2e latency qps = 2: 9.7 ms ITL, 0.49s e2e latency qps = 4: 10.1 ms ITL, 0.52s e2e latency qps = 6: 11.9 ms ITL, 0.59s e2e latency qps = 8: 14.0 ms ITL, 0.70s e2e latency qps = 10: 15.7 ms ITL, 0.79s e2e latency After this PR (with static activation scaling): qps = 1: 9.8 ms ITL, 0.49s e2e latency qps = 2: 9.7 ms ITL, 0.49s e2e latency qps = 4: 10.2 ms ITL, 0.53s e2e latency qps = 6: 11.9 ms ITL, 0.59s e2e latency qps = 8: 11.9 ms ITL, 0.59s e2e latency qps = 10: 12.1 ms ITL, 0.61s e2e latency
z103cb
pushed a commit
to z103cb/opendatahub_vllm
that referenced
this pull request
May 7, 2024
This PR updates the tuning script for the fused_moe kernel to support FP8 and also adds configurations for TP4. Note that for the configuration I removed num_warps and num_stages for small batch sizes since that improved performance and brought the benchmarks on par with the numbers before in that regime to make sure this is a strict improvement over the status quo. All the numbers below are for mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1, 1000 input and 50 output tokens. Before this PR (with static activation scaling): qps = 1: 9.8 ms ITL, 0.49s e2e latency qps = 2: 9.7 ms ITL, 0.49s e2e latency qps = 4: 10.1 ms ITL, 0.52s e2e latency qps = 6: 11.9 ms ITL, 0.59s e2e latency qps = 8: 14.0 ms ITL, 0.70s e2e latency qps = 10: 15.7 ms ITL, 0.79s e2e latency After this PR (with static activation scaling): qps = 1: 9.8 ms ITL, 0.49s e2e latency qps = 2: 9.7 ms ITL, 0.49s e2e latency qps = 4: 10.2 ms ITL, 0.53s e2e latency qps = 6: 11.9 ms ITL, 0.59s e2e latency qps = 8: 11.9 ms ITL, 0.59s e2e latency qps = 10: 12.1 ms ITL, 0.61s e2e latency
dtrifiro
pushed a commit
to opendatahub-io/vllm
that referenced
this pull request
May 7, 2024
This PR updates the tuning script for the fused_moe kernel to support FP8 and also adds configurations for TP4. Note that for the configuration I removed num_warps and num_stages for small batch sizes since that improved performance and brought the benchmarks on par with the numbers before in that regime to make sure this is a strict improvement over the status quo. All the numbers below are for mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1, 1000 input and 50 output tokens. Before this PR (with static activation scaling): qps = 1: 9.8 ms ITL, 0.49s e2e latency qps = 2: 9.7 ms ITL, 0.49s e2e latency qps = 4: 10.1 ms ITL, 0.52s e2e latency qps = 6: 11.9 ms ITL, 0.59s e2e latency qps = 8: 14.0 ms ITL, 0.70s e2e latency qps = 10: 15.7 ms ITL, 0.79s e2e latency After this PR (with static activation scaling): qps = 1: 9.8 ms ITL, 0.49s e2e latency qps = 2: 9.7 ms ITL, 0.49s e2e latency qps = 4: 10.2 ms ITL, 0.53s e2e latency qps = 6: 11.9 ms ITL, 0.59s e2e latency qps = 8: 11.9 ms ITL, 0.59s e2e latency qps = 10: 12.1 ms ITL, 0.61s e2e latency
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR updates the tuning script for the fused_moe kernel to support FP8 and also adds configurations for TP4. Note that for the configuration I removed
num_warps
andnum_stages
for small batch sizes since that improved performance and brought the benchmarks on par with the numbers before in that regime to make sure this is a strict improvement over the status quo.All the numbers below are for mistralai/Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1, 1000 input and 50 output tokens.
Before this PR (with static activation scaling):
After this PR (with static activation scaling):
PR Checklist (Click to Expand)
Thank you for your contribution to vLLM! Before submitting the pull request, please ensure the PR meets the following criteria. This helps vLLM maintain the code quality and improve the efficiency of the review process.
PR Title and Classification
Only specific types of PRs will be reviewed. The PR title is prefixed appropriately to indicate the type of change. Please use one of the following:
[Bugfix]
for bug fixes.[CI/Build]
for build or continuous integration improvements.[Doc]
for documentation fixes and improvements.[Model]
for adding a new model or improving an existing model. Model name should appear in the title.[Frontend]
For changes on the vLLM frontend (e.g., OpenAI API server,LLM
class, etc.)[Kernel]
for changes affecting CUDA kernels or other compute kernels.[Core]
for changes in the core vLLM logic (e.g.,LLMEngine
,AsyncLLMEngine
,Scheduler
, etc.)[Hardware][Vendor]
for hardware-specific changes. Vendor name should appear in the prefix (e.g.,[Hardware][AMD]
).[Misc]
for PRs that do not fit the above categories. Please use this sparingly.Note: If the PR spans more than one category, please include all relevant prefixes.
Code Quality
The PR need to meet the following code quality standards:
format.sh
to format your code.docs/source/
if the PR modifies the user-facing behaviors of vLLM. It helps vLLM user understand and utilize the new features or changes.Notes for Large Changes
Please keep the changes as concise as possible. For major architectural changes (>500 LOC excluding kernel/data/config/test), we would expect a GitHub issue (RFC) discussing the technical design and justification. Otherwise, we will tag it with
rfc-required
and might not go through the PR.What to Expect for the Reviews
The goal of the vLLM team is to be a transparent reviewing machine. We would like to make the review process transparent and efficient and make sure no contributor feel confused or frustrated. However, the vLLM team is small, so we need to prioritize some PRs over others. Here is what you can expect from the review process:
action-required
label on the PR if there are changes required. The contributor should address the comments and ping the reviewer to re-review the PR.Thank You
Finally, thank you for taking the time to read these guidelines and for your interest in contributing to vLLM. Your contributions make vLLM a great tool for everyone!