-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Restore File::unique() helper #186
Open
damsfx
wants to merge
7
commits into
wintercms:develop
Choose a base branch
from
damsfx:develop
base: develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
45d0748
Restore File::unique() method
damsfx 0f2b4c4
Retore FileSystem unique test
damsfx c9e9095
Fix code quality check
damsfx 0c9dbc5
Merge branch 'wintercms:develop' into develop
damsfx bf4762e
Merge commit 'f04400144927db674d32a5edb9bf5a0e2019ae97' into develop
damsfx d66cc3f
Add unique() method signature to the File facade
damsfx 43ba814
Update tests/Filesystem/FilesystemTest.php
LukeTowers File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@damsfx it should probably allow the input to be returned unmodified if it doesn't exist within the array.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@LukeTowers If the entry doesn't exist in the array, it must be returned with another index anyway, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@damsfx I'm making the suggestion that if it doesn't exist in the array it should be returned unmodified. The method is intended to give you a unique filename provided the input of a desired filename and a list of already existing options. If the filename provided is already unique, then there's no need to modify it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@LukeTowers So in a such case, the same filename is needed in the array of references to get the next incremented name.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The suggested change above should list all the cases that I think the method should need to handle, I've already updated the tests so it should just require a minor change in the method itself.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@LukeTowers Your modifications in tests goes to a failure for me.
FAILED !
The function return
wintert_2.cms
in that case.What I don't understand is why you want to return the unmodified value if it's unique.
In any case, we should return the incremented value! 🤯
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@damsfx The tests are failing because the method doesn't currently have the logic to allow the name to be returned unmodified. The method claims to return a unique filename given the input of a desired filename and a list of existing filenames; why does it have to always return an incremented value if the desired filename isn't present?