[DEV-1741] HCM interventions data model change

[Esaotuelr]

Description

Added the following messages/classes/types:

• StaticVarCompensator
• SVCControlMode
• EndDeviceFunction
• PanDemandResponseFunction
• ControlledAppliance
• EndDeviceFunctionKind
• AssetFunction
• BatteryControl

Added new attributes to RegulatingControl:

• ctPrimary
• minTargetDeadband

Added repeated attribute of batteryControls to BatteryUnit.

Added repeated attribute of endDeviceFunctions to EndDevice.

Test Steps

Explain in detail how your reviewer can test the changes proposed in this PR. If it cannot be tested, leave an explanation on why.

Checklist

If any of these are not applicable, strikethrough the line ~like this~. Do not delete it!. Let the reviewer decide if you should have done it.

Code

• I have performed a self review of my own code (including checking issues raised when creating the PR).
• I have added/updated unit tests for these changes, and if not I have explained why they are not necessary.
• I have commented my code in any hard-to-understand or hacky areas.
• I have handled all new warnings generated by the compiler or IDE.
• I have rebased onto the target branch (usually main).

Documentation

• I have updated the changelog.
• I have updated any documentation required for these changes.

Breaking Changes

• I have considered if this is a breaking change and will communicate it with other team members if so.

I think this shouldntt be a breaking change as we are only adding stuff.

[ryanjcoleman]

Task linked: DEV-1741 Update evolve-grpc

[charlta]

I updated the name of the PR and the description to be more useful than "data model change".

I didn't change the branch name (which I should have) as it will close the PR

[charlta]

Added ewb-core as reviewers as it shouldn't have been sent straight to me.

[Esaotuelr]

I updated the name of the PR and the description to be more useful than "data model change".

I didn't change the branch name (which I should have) as it will close the PR

Thanks for that. Also I wasn't sure who could review this so I did just straight put your name against it for review. I'll put ewb-core for the rest of the other changes.

[charlta]

I have barely looked at the PR and found some very sloppy mistakes.

Given this and the lazy nature of the PR name and description I feel this requires a more thorough self review before I look at it any further.