Test: src/graphql/types/tag/creator.ts #3170
Conversation
WalkthroughThis PR refactors the Tag creator resolution by extracting the inline resolver logic into a new function, Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/graphql/types/Tag/creator.ts(1 hunks)test/graphql/types/tag/creator.test.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
src/graphql/types/Tag/creator.ts
[warning] 1-1: Import statements could be sorted.
test/graphql/types/tag/creator.test.ts
[warning] 1-1: Import statements could be sorted.
[warning] 21-21: Formatter would have printed the following content.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/graphql/types/Tag/creator.ts (3)
7-57: Well-structured authentication and authorization flow!The implementation follows best practices:
- Strong typing with TypeScript
- Early authentication checks
- Clear error messages with proper GraphQL error codes
- Comprehensive role-based access control
59-98: Robust error handling and performance optimization!The implementation includes:
- Proper null handling
- Performance optimization by returning current user when possible
- Comprehensive error handling with detailed logging for data corruption
100-108: Clean GraphQL field implementation!The Tag implementation follows GraphQL best practices with proper field description and type definition.
test/graphql/types/tag/creator.test.ts (2)
162-271: Excellent test coverage for creator retrieval!The tests thoroughly cover:
- Null creator cases
- Authorization scenarios
- Current user optimizations
- Database error conditions
33-274: Comprehensive test suite meeting PR objectives!The test implementation:
- Covers all edge cases
- Validates error handling
- Tests authorization scenarios
- Ensures data integrity checks
|
Please fix the failing tests and make code rabbit approve your work |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
src/graphql/types/Tag/creator.ts (1)
1-5: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Sort imports to fix pipeline warning.
There is a pipeline warning regarding import order. This suggestion aligns them in an alphabetical manner and groups type-only imports together.
Below is a possible fix:
- import type { GraphQLContext } from "../../context"; - import { Tag } from "./Tag"; - import type { Tag as TagType } from "./Tag"; - import { TalawaGraphQLError } from "~/src/utilities/TalawaGraphQLError"; - import { User } from "~/src/graphql/types/User/User"; + import type { GraphQLContext } from "../../context"; + import type { Tag as TagType } from "./Tag"; + import { Tag } from "./Tag"; + import { TalawaGraphQLError } from "~/src/utilities/TalawaGraphQLError"; + import { User } from "~/src/graphql/types/User/User";🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
[warning] 1-1: Import statements could be sorted.
test/graphql/types/tag/creator.test.ts (1)
1-6: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Sort imports to fix pipeline warning.
As indicated by the pipeline, sorting imports helps maintain a consistent style. This is the same request from a prior review but is still applicable.
Below is a possible fix:
- import { beforeEach, describe, it, expect } from "vitest"; - import { vi } from "vitest"; - import type { CurrentClient, GraphQLContext } from "~/src/graphql/context"; - import { tagCreatorResolver } from "~/src/graphql/types/Tag/creator"; - import type { Tag } from "~/src/graphql/types/Tag/Tag"; - import { TalawaGraphQLError } from "~/src/utilities/TalawaGraphQLError"; + import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest"; + import type { CurrentClient, GraphQLContext } from "~/src/graphql/context"; + import type { Tag } from "~/src/graphql/types/Tag/Tag"; + import { tagCreatorResolver } from "~/src/graphql/types/Tag/creator"; + import { TalawaGraphQLError } from "~/src/utilities/TalawaGraphQLError";🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
[warning] 1-1: Import statements could be sorted.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/graphql/types/Tag/creator.ts(1 hunks)test/graphql/types/tag/creator.test.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
src/graphql/types/Tag/creator.ts
[warning] 1-1: Import statements could be sorted.
test/graphql/types/tag/creator.test.ts
[warning] 1-1: Import statements could be sorted.
[warning] 21-21: Formatter would have printed the following content.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/graphql/types/Tag/creator.ts (1)
7-98: Implementation looks robust.The authentication, authorization, and error handling logic in the resolver appears consistent with best practices. Error cases are clearly distinguished, and the code is maintainable.
test/graphql/types/tag/creator.test.ts (2)
33-274: Comprehensive test coverage.The tests thoroughly validate authentication, authorization, and the different scenarios of creator retrieval. Overall, they appear well-structured and cohesive.
59-59: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Refine test description wording.
Consider changing the phrase "organizationMemberShip" to "organization membership" to match standard naming/grammar.
For example:
- it("should throw unauthorized_action for non admin and no organizationMemberShip", async () => { + it("should throw unauthorized_action for non admin and no organization membership", async () => {Likely invalid or redundant comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/graphql/types/tag/creator.test.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
test/graphql/types/tag/creator.test.ts
[warning] 1-1: Import statements could be sorted.
[warning] 21-21: Formatter would have printed the following content.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
test/graphql/types/tag/creator.test.ts (4)
1-6: Sort imports alphabetically.The import statements should be sorted alphabetically to comply with the project's style guide and fix the pipeline warning.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
[warning] 1-1: Import statements could be sorted.
8-49: Well-structured test setup!The mock context and test initialization are comprehensive, type-safe, and follow testing best practices.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
[warning] 21-21: Formatter would have printed the following content.
168-168: Fix misspelled "administrator" role.The role is misspelled as "administartor" which could cause test failures.
162-272: Excellent test coverage for creator retrieval scenarios!The test suite thoroughly covers:
- Null creator cases
- Authorization checks
- Database error handling
- Different user role scenarios
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
test/graphql/types/tag/creator.test.ts (2)
167-167:⚠️ Potential issueFix misspelled "administrator" role.
The role "administartor" is misspelled, which could cause authorization checks to fail.
Apply this diff to fix the spelling:
- role: "administartor", + role: "administrator",
33-398: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Comprehensive test coverage with room for enhancement.
The test suite is well-structured and covers critical scenarios including authentication, authorization, error handling, and concurrent access. However, consider adding the following test cases:
- Rate limiting scenarios
- Session timeout edge cases
- Cache invalidation tests
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/graphql/types/tag/creator.test.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
test/graphql/types/tag/creator.test.ts
[warning] 2-5: Import statements could be sorted.
[warning] 396-400: Formatter would have printed the following content.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
test/graphql/types/tag/creator.test.ts (4)
8-22: LGTM! Well-structured mock context setup.The mock context setup is comprehensive and includes all necessary properties for testing.
270-334: LGTM! Thorough database error handling tests.The Database Query Errors test suite effectively covers various database failure scenarios:
- Connection errors
- Timeout errors
- Constraint violations
- Syntax errors
Each test properly verifies both the error response and logging behavior.
336-396: LGTM! Well-implemented concurrent access tests.The Concurrent Access test suite effectively handles:
- Concurrent updates to the same tag
- Database errors during concurrent access
- Proper error logging
The tests demonstrate good practices in handling race conditions and maintaining data consistency.
1-6: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionSort imports alphabetically to fix pipeline warning.
The imports need to be sorted alphabetically according to the pipeline warning.
Apply this diff to fix the import order:
-import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it } from "vitest"; -import { vi } from "vitest"; -import type { CurrentClient, GraphQLContext } from "~/src/graphql/context"; -import { tagCreatorResolver } from "~/src/graphql/types/Tag/creator"; -import type { Tag as TagType } from "~/src/graphql/types/Tag/Tag"; -import { TalawaGraphQLError } from "~/src/utilities/TalawaGraphQLError"; +import type { CurrentClient, GraphQLContext } from "~/src/graphql/context"; +import { tagCreatorResolver } from "~/src/graphql/types/Tag/creator"; +import type { Tag as TagType } from "~/src/graphql/types/Tag/Tag"; +import { TalawaGraphQLError } from "~/src/utilities/TalawaGraphQLError"; +import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it } from "vitest"; +import { vi } from "vitest";Likely invalid or redundant comment.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
[warning] 2-5: Import statements could be sorted.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #3170 +/- ##
====================================================
+ Coverage 39.90% 40.11% +0.21%
====================================================
Files 455 455
Lines 33527 33543 +16
Branches 415 433 +18
====================================================
+ Hits 13378 13457 +79
+ Misses 20149 20086 -63 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/graphql/types/Tag/creator.ts (1)
100-108: Keep the resolver name consistent with field naming.While “creator” is sufficiently descriptive, consider ensuring the
tagCreatorResolvername aligns with any naming conventions in other Tag fields or resolvers, if applicable, to maintain codebase consistency.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/graphql/types/Tag/creator.ts(1 hunks)test/graphql/types/tag/creator.test.ts(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/graphql/types/Tag/creator.ts (1)
3-5: Sort imports to comply with previous pipeline warnings.This project’s style guide requires imports to be sorted alphabetically or logically. Since a similar comment was made in a previous review, marking this as a repeated suggestion.
test/graphql/types/tag/creator.test.ts (1)
167-167: Correct the “administrator” role spelling.The role is spelled “administartor,” which may break admin logic checks. This issue was flagged previously and must be updated consistently throughout the tests.
|
@palisadoes i made minimal changes in the target file like exporting the resolver (tag/creater.ts) to focus on testing logic. please suggest if any changes required. |
palisadoes
merged commit 62919b6
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Added unit tests to cover edge cases and validate the new implementation.
Ensured that existing tests align with the updated functionality.
Issue Number:
Fixes #3074
Snapshots/Videos:
Summary
Added unit tests to cover edge cases and validate the new implementation.
Ensured that existing tests align with the updated functionality.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
no
Checklist
CodeRabbit AI Review
Test Coverage
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit