Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SPARK-27004][core] Remove stale HTTP auth code. #24033

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

vanzin
Copy link
Contributor

@vanzin vanzin commented Mar 8, 2019

This code is from the era when Spark used an HTTP server to distribute
dependencies, which is long gone. Nowadays it only causes problems when
someone is using dependencies from an HTTP server with Spark auth on.

This code is from the era when Spark used an HTTP server to distribute
dependencies, which is long gone. Nowadays it only causes problems when
someone is using dependencies from an HTTP server with Spark auth on.
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Mar 9, 2019

Test build #103236 has finished for PR 24033 at commit 8776452.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

Copy link
Member

@felixcheung felixcheung left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this ever documented? do we need to put into some migration guide/release note?

@vanzin
Copy link
Contributor Author

vanzin commented Mar 9, 2019

There's nothing to document. The original feature doesn't exist, and all this code does now is break things if someone is trying to download from https.

@vanzin
Copy link
Contributor Author

vanzin commented Mar 11, 2019

Merging to master.

@vanzin vanzin closed this in f1e223b Mar 11, 2019
@vanzin vanzin deleted the SPARK-27004 branch April 17, 2019 21:49
dongjoon-hyun pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 29, 2020
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is kind of a followup of #24033.
The first and last usage of that argument `SecurityManager` was removed in #24033.
After that,  we don't need to pass `SecurityManager` anymore in `Utils.fetchFile` and related code paths.

This PR proposes to remove it out.

### Why are the changes needed?

For better readability of codes.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No, dev-only.

### How was this patch tested?

Manually complied. GitHub Actions and Jenkins build should test it out as well.

Closes #30945 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-33925.

Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
dongjoon-hyun pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2021
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This is kind of a followup of #24033 and #30945.
Many of references in `SecurityManager` were introduced from SPARK-1189, and related usages were removed later from #24033 and #30945. This PR proposes to remove them out.

### Why are the changes needed?

For better readability of codes.

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?

No, dev-only.

### How was this patch tested?

Manually complied. GitHub Actions and Jenkins build should test it out as well.

Closes #31636 from HyukjinKwon/SPARK-34520.

Authored-by: HyukjinKwon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants