Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP Feature/elasticsearch 6 #2870

Merged
merged 58 commits into from
Nov 16, 2017
Merged

WIP Feature/elasticsearch 6 #2870

merged 58 commits into from
Nov 16, 2017

Conversation

Mpdreamz
Copy link
Member

@Mpdreamz Mpdreamz commented Oct 10, 2017

Failed collections:

pending join data type support

  • ManualReindex: Tests.Document.Multiple.Reindex.ReindexApiTests
  • ReadOnly: Tests.Aggregations.ChildrenAggregationFluentAggsUsageTests
  • ReadOnly: Tests.Document.Multiple.MultiGet.MultiGetParentApiTests

pending rc2 reverting back how inner hits _source is returned

elastic/elasticsearch#26944 (comment)

  • Writable: Tests.Reproduce.GithubIssue2788
  • ReadOnly: Tests.Aggregations.Bucket.Children.ChildrenAggregationUsageTests
  • IntrusiveOperation: Tests.Search.Request.QueryInnerHitsApiTests

pending rc2

elastic/elasticsearch#27070

  • XPack: Tests.XPack.Watcher.DeleteWatch.DeleteNonExistentWatchApiTests

New Features

Not extensive, need a final pass over release notes and core github issues.

Breaking changes

@Mpdreamz Mpdreamz mentioned this pull request Oct 21, 2017
37 tasks
@Mpdreamz Mpdreamz force-pushed the feature/elasticsearch-6 branch 2 times, most recently from a0cbfc2 to ffea670 Compare October 21, 2017 19:33
@codebrain
Copy link
Contributor

3 Additional APIs are in here: #2894

Mpdreamz and others added 26 commits November 16, 2017 09:47
Erroroneously not included in Elasticsearch 6.0.0-beta1. Including allows tests to run against 6.0.0-beta1.
See https://discuss.elastic.co/t/x-pack-env-bat-is-missing/98033
This commit represents the base for the codegeneration for Elasticsearch
6.0.0-beta2 which deals with the changes in the spec and the removed
API's.

Compiles and unit tests are happy. Will send PR's against this branch to
deal with all the actual request/response changes and adding support for
new API's
Microsoft.Test.Sdk feels like injecting a Main method for some reason.

I tried to read up why it does so or why this package is even needed:

microsoft/vstest#986

has something to do with magically supporting netcoreapp 1.1 targets but
i dread reading more. This is the sort of thing that tires me so much
doing .NET development..

The whole point this dependency is even needed infuriates me.
…egration tests now prints failed collections AND the build command to replay only the failed integration tests
…them updated to reflect the single type world better moving many tests from CommitActivity to Developer
This commit represents the base for the codegeneration for Elasticsearch
6.0.0-beta2 which deals with the changes in the spec and the removed
API's.

Compiles and unit tests are happy. Will send PR's against this branch to
deal with all the actual request/response changes and adding support for
new API's
Mpdreamz and others added 27 commits November 16, 2017 09:48
… 1 elasticsearch type, but index subclasses (parent/children) in the same index without losing easy automapping for all
…pdated all the failing unit tests as a result of that
…d up inference related types. GetHashCode() now takes typeof itself into account
…ork now reports back on all deprecations it sees during the integration test run as well
… option, ignore case is ignored on syn and syn_graph and deprecated now
…hey have been deprecated, now used source filtering instead
* Implementation of: GrokProcessorPatterns, NodesUsage and DeprecationInfo
Remove [JsonProperty(PropertyName = "....")]
@Mpdreamz Mpdreamz force-pushed the feature/elasticsearch-6 branch from 0e54cd1 to 1e18ac6 Compare November 16, 2017 08:49
@Mpdreamz Mpdreamz merged commit 41b7349 into master Nov 16, 2017
@Mpdreamz Mpdreamz deleted the feature/elasticsearch-6 branch November 16, 2017 08:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants