cleanup(OWNERS): remove inactive approvers

[jasondellaluce]

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

/kind documentation

Any specific area of the project related to this PR?

/area engine

What this PR does / why we need it:

For falcosecurity/evolution#157, this PR moves inactive approvers (who had very little or zero contributions over the past 6 months) from approvers to emeritus_approvers in OWNERS.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

[poiana]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jasondellaluce

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [jasondellaluce]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[fntlnz]

Please restore https://github.com/falcosecurity/falco/issues/2115#issuecomment-1176045086

[leodido]

https://github.com/falcosecurity/falco/issues/2115#issuecomment-1176048415

[leogr]

This PR has been on hold for 13 days now. It has been blocked because of the pending "change requests" (and the reviewer decided to step down). In any case, the change looks legit to me since I have not seen any relevant activity from them in the last 6 months (as per our governance), and in the last year in general.

I think all the remaining maintainers agree (cc @mstemm @jasondellaluce @FedeDP ). So, I'd ask @jasondellaluce to close this PR and open a new one.

[jasondellaluce]

This PR has been on hold for 13 days now. It has been blocked because of the pending "change requests" (and the reviewer decided to step down). In any case, the change looks legit to me since I have not seen any relevant activity from them in the last 6 months (as per our governance), and in the last year in general.

I think all the remaining maintainers agree (cc @mstemm @jasondellaluce @FedeDP ). So, I'd ask @jasondellaluce to close this PR and open a new one.

I agree and confirm my standpoint as in falcosecurity/evolution#157. Considering that the reviewers expressed their will to step down, I'm closing this in favor of #2134.

/close

[poiana]

@jasondellaluce: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

This PR has been on hold for 13 days now. It has been blocked because of the pending "change requests" (and the reviewer decided to step down). In any case, the change looks legit to me since I have not seen any relevant activity from them in the last 6 months (as per our governance), and in the last year in general.

I think all the remaining maintainers agree (cc @mstemm @jasondellaluce @FedeDP ). So, I'd ask @jasondellaluce to close this PR and open a new one.

I agree and confirm my standpoint as in falcosecurity/evolution#157. Considering that the reviewers expressed their will to step down, I'm closing this in favor of #2134.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.