Pull request #1
Closed
Pull request #1
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
This will return EIO when __bread() fails to read SB, instead of EINVAL. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
…INTK defined
error handling logic behaves differently with or without
CONFIG_PRINTK defined, since there are two copies of the same
function which a bit of different logic
One, when CONFIG_PRINTK is defined, code is
__btrfs_std_error(..)
{
::
save_error_info(fs_info);
if (sb->s_flags & MS_BORN)
btrfs_handle_error(fs_info);
}
and two when CONFIG_PRINTK is not defined, the code is
__btrfs_std_error(..)
{
::
if (sb->s_flags & MS_BORN) {
save_error_info(fs_info);
btrfs_handle_error(fs_info);
}
}
I doubt if this was intentional ? and appear to have caused since
we maintain two copies of the same function and they got diverged
with commits.
Now to decide which logic is correct reviewed changes as below,
533574c
Commit added two copies of this function
cf79ffb
Commit made change to only one copy of the function and to the
copy when CONFIG_PRINTK is defined.
To fix this, instead of maintaining two copies of same function
approach, maintain single function, and just put the extra
portion of the code under CONFIG_PRINTK define.
This patch just does that. And keeps code of with CONFIG_PRINTK
defined.
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
btrfs_error() and btrfs_std_error() does the same thing and calls _btrfs_std_error(), so consolidate them together. And the main motivation is that btrfs_error() is closely named with btrfs_err(), one handles error action the other is to log the error, so don't closely name them. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]> Suggested-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
…ot found Use btrfs specific error code BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_MISSING_NOT_FOUND instead of -ENOENT. Next this removes the logging when user specifies "missing" and we don't find it in the kernel device list. Logging are for system events not for user input errors. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
This uses a chunk of code from btrfs_read_dev_super() and creates a function called btrfs_read_dev_one_super() so that next patch can use it for scratch superblock. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]> [renamed bufhead to bh] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
This patch updates and renames btrfs_scratch_superblocks, (which is used by the replace device thread), with those fixes from the scratch superblock code section of btrfs_rm_device(). The fixes are: Scratch all copies of superblock Notify kobject that superblock has been changed Update time on the device So that btrfs_rm_device() can use the function btrfs_scratch_superblocks() instead of its own scratch code. And further replace deivce code which similarly releases device back to the system, will have the fixes from the btrfs device delete. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]> [renamed to btrfs_scratch_superblock] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
By general rule of thumb there shouldn't be any way that user land could trigger a kernel operation just by sending wrong arguments. Here do commit cleanups after user input has been verified. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Originally the message was not in a helper but ended up there. We should print error messages from callers instead. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]> [reworded subject and changelog] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]> [reworded subject and changelog] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
To avoid deadlock described in commit 084b6e7 ("btrfs: Fix a lockdep warning when running xfstest."), we should move kobj stuff out of dev_replace lock range. "It is because the btrfs_kobj_{add/rm}_device() will call memory allocation with GFP_KERNEL, which may flush fs page cache to free space, waiting for it self to do the commit, causing the deadlock. To solve the problem, move btrfs_kobj_{add/rm}_device() out of the dev_replace lock range, also involing split the btrfs_rm_dev_replace_srcdev() function into remove and free parts. Now only btrfs_rm_dev_replace_remove_srcdev() is called in dev_replace lock range, and kobj_{add/rm} and btrfs_rm_dev_replace_free_srcdev() are called out of the lock range." Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]> [added lockup description] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
This patch will log return value of add/del_qgroup_relation() and pass the err code of btrfs_run_qgroups to the btrfs_std_error(). Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]>
A part of code from btrfs_scan_one_device() is moved to a new function btrfs_read_disk_super(), so that former function looks cleaner and moves the code to ensure null terminating label to it as well. Further there is opportunity to merge various duplicate code on read disk super. Earlier attempt on this was highlighted that there was some issues for which there are multiple versions, however it was not clear what was issue. So until its worked out we can keep it in a separate function. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]>
Optional Label may or may not be set, or it might be set at some time later. However while debugging to search through the kernel logs the scripts would need the logs to be consistent, so logs search key words shouldn't depend on the optional variables, instead fsid is better. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]>
From the issue diagnosable point of view, log if the device path is changed. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]>
looks like oversight, call brelse() when checksum fails. further down the code in the non error path we do call brelse() and so we don't see brelse() in the goto error.. paths. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]>
optimize check for stale device to only be checked when there is device added or changed. If there is no update to the device, there is no need to call btrfs_free_stale_device(). Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]>
This adds an enhancement to show the seed fsid and its devices
on the btrfs sysfs.
The way sprouting handles fs_devices:
clone seed fs_devices and add to the fs_uuids
mem copy seed fs_devices and assign to fs_devices->seed (move dev_list)
evacuate seed fs_devices contents to hold sprout fs devices contents
So to be inline with this fs_devices changes during seeding,
represent seed fsid under the sprout fsid, this is achieved
by using the kobject_move()
The end result will be,
/sys/fs/btrfs/sprout-fsid/seed/level-1-seed-fsid/seed/(if)level-2-seed-fsid
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]>
We need fsid kobject to hold pool attributes however its created only when fs is mounted. So, this patch changes the life cycle of the fsid and devices kobjects /sys/fs/btrfs/<fsid> and /sys/fs/btrfs/<fsid>/devices, from created and destroyed by mount and unmount event to created and destroyed by scanned and module-unload events respectively. However this does not alter life cycle of fs attributes as such. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]>
move a section of btrfs_rm_device() code to check for min number
of the devices into the function __check_raid_min_devices()
v2: commit update and title renamed from
Btrfs: move check for min number of devices to a function
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]>
__check_raid_min_device() which was pealed from btrfs_rm_device() maintianed its original code to show the block move. This patch cleans up __check_raid_min_device(). Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]>
The patch renames btrfs_dev_replace_find_srcdev() to
btrfs_find_device_by_user_input() and moves it to volumes.c.
so that delete device can use it.
v2: changed title from
'Btrfs: create rename btrfs_dev_replace_find_srcdev()'
and commit update
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]>
btrfs_rm_device() has a section of the code which can be replaced btrfs_find_device_by_user_input() Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]>
The operation of device replace and device delete follows same steps upto some depth with in btrfs kernel, however they don't share codes. This enhancement will help replace and delete to share codes. Btrfs: enhance check device_path in btrfs_find_device_by_user_input() Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]>
With the previous patches now the btrfs_scratch_superblocks() is ready to be used in btrfs_rm_device() so use it. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]>
This introduces new ioctl BTRFS_IOC_RM_DEV_V2, which uses enhanced struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args_v2 to carry devid as an user argument. The patch won't delete the old ioctl interface and remains backward compatible with user land progs. Test case/script: echo "0 $(blockdev --getsz /dev/sdf) linear /dev/sdf 0" | dmsetup create bad_disk mkfs.btrfs -f -d raid1 -m raid1 /dev/sdd /dev/sde /dev/mapper/bad_disk mount /dev/sdd /btrfs dmsetup suspend bad_disk echo "0 $(blockdev --getsz /dev/sdf) error /dev/sdf 0" | dmsetup load bad_disk dmsetup resume bad_disk echo "bad disk failed. now deleting/replacing" btrfs dev del 3 /btrfs echo $? btrfs fi show /btrfs umount /btrfs btrfs-show-super /dev/sdd | egrep num_device dmsetup remove bad_disk wipefs -a /dev/sdf Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <[email protected]> Reported-by: Martin <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2025
dm_get_plane_scale doesn't take into account plane scaled size equal to zero, leading to a kernel oops due to division by zero. Fix by setting out-scale size as zero when the dst size is zero, similar to what is done by drm_calc_scale(). This issue started with the introduction of cursor ovelay mode that uses this function to assess cursor mode changes via dm_crtc_get_cursor_mode() before checking plane state. [Dec17 17:14] Oops: divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI [ +0.000018] CPU: 5 PID: 1660 Comm: surface-DP-1 Not tainted 6.10.0+ torvalds#231 [ +0.000007] Hardware name: Valve Jupiter/Jupiter, BIOS F7A0131 01/30/2024 [ +0.000004] RIP: 0010:dm_get_plane_scale+0x3f/0x60 [amdgpu] [ +0.000553] Code: 44 0f b7 41 3a 44 0f b7 49 3e 83 e0 0f 48 0f a3 c2 73 21 69 41 28 e8 03 00 00 31 d2 41 f7 f1 31 d2 89 06 69 41 2c e8 03 00 00 <41> f7 f0 89 07 e9 d7 d8 7e e9 44 89 c8 45 89 c1 41 89 c0 eb d4 66 [ +0.000005] RSP: 0018:ffffa8df0de6b8a0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ +0.000006] RAX: 00000000000003e8 RBX: ffff9ac65c1f6e00 RCX: ffff9ac65d055500 [ +0.000003] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffa8df0de6b8b0 RDI: ffffa8df0de6b8b4 [ +0.000004] RBP: ffff9ac64e7a5800 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000a00 [ +0.000003] R10: 00000000000000ff R11: 0000000000000054 R12: ffff9ac6d0700010 [ +0.000003] R13: ffff9ac65d054f00 R14: ffff9ac65d055500 R15: ffff9ac64e7a60a0 [ +0.000004] FS: 00007f869ea00640(0000) GS:ffff9ac970080000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ +0.000004] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ +0.000003] CR2: 000055ca701becd0 CR3: 000000010e7f2000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 [ +0.000004] Call Trace: [ +0.000007] <TASK> [ +0.000006] ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x27 [ +0.000009] ? die+0x2e/0x50 [ +0.000007] ? do_trap+0xca/0x110 [ +0.000007] ? do_error_trap+0x6a/0x90 [ +0.000006] ? dm_get_plane_scale+0x3f/0x60 [amdgpu] [ +0.000504] ? exc_divide_error+0x38/0x50 [ +0.000005] ? dm_get_plane_scale+0x3f/0x60 [amdgpu] [ +0.000488] ? asm_exc_divide_error+0x1a/0x20 [ +0.000011] ? dm_get_plane_scale+0x3f/0x60 [amdgpu] [ +0.000593] dm_crtc_get_cursor_mode+0x33f/0x430 [amdgpu] [ +0.000562] amdgpu_dm_atomic_check+0x2ef/0x1770 [amdgpu] [ +0.000501] drm_atomic_check_only+0x5e1/0xa30 [drm] [ +0.000047] drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x832/0xcb0 [drm] [ +0.000050] ? __pfx_drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [drm] [ +0.000047] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xb3/0x100 [drm] [ +0.000062] drm_ioctl+0x27a/0x4f0 [drm] [ +0.000049] ? __pfx_drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [drm] [ +0.000055] amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0x4e/0x90 [amdgpu] [ +0.000360] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x97/0xd0 [ +0.000010] do_syscall_64+0x82/0x190 [ +0.000008] ? __pfx_drm_mode_createblob_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [drm] [ +0.000044] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000006] ? drm_ioctl_kernel+0xb3/0x100 [drm] [ +0.000040] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000005] ? __check_object_size+0x50/0x220 [ +0.000007] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000005] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000005] ? drm_ioctl+0x2a4/0x4f0 [drm] [ +0.000039] ? __pfx_drm_mode_createblob_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [drm] [ +0.000043] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000005] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000005] ? __pm_runtime_suspend+0x69/0xc0 [ +0.000006] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000005] ? amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0x71/0x90 [amdgpu] [ +0.000366] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000006] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x77/0x210 [ +0.000007] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000005] ? do_syscall_64+0x8e/0x190 [ +0.000006] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000006] ? do_syscall_64+0x8e/0x190 [ +0.000006] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000007] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ +0.000008] RIP: 0033:0x55bb7cd962bc [ +0.000007] Code: 4c 89 6c 24 18 4c 89 64 24 20 4c 89 74 24 28 0f 57 c0 0f 11 44 24 30 89 c7 48 8d 54 24 08 b8 10 00 00 00 be bc 64 38 c0 0f 05 <49> 89 c7 48 83 3b 00 74 09 4c 89 c7 ff 15 62 64 99 00 48 83 7b 18 [ +0.000005] RSP: 002b:00007f869e9f4da0 EFLAGS: 00000217 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [ +0.000007] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f869e9f4fb8 RCX: 000055bb7cd962bc [ +0.000004] RDX: 00007f869e9f4da8 RSI: 00000000c03864bc RDI: 000000000000003b [ +0.000003] RBP: 000055bb9ddcbcc0 R08: 00007f86541b9920 R09: 0000000000000009 [ +0.000004] R10: 0000000000000004 R11: 0000000000000217 R12: 00007f865406c6b0 [ +0.000003] R13: 00007f86541b5290 R14: 00007f865410b700 R15: 000055bb9ddcbc18 [ +0.000009] </TASK> Fixes: 1b04dcc ("drm/amd/display: Introduce overlay cursor mode") Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/3729 Reported-by: Fabio Scaccabarozzi <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Fabio Scaccabarozzi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Fabio Scaccabarozzi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Melissa Wen <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit ab75a0d) Cc: [email protected]
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2025
die() can be called in exception handler, and therefore cannot sleep. However, die() takes spinlock_t which can sleep with PREEMPT_RT enabled. That causes the following warning: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 285, name: mutex preempt_count: 110001, expected: 0 RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 285 Comm: mutex Not tainted 6.12.0-rc7-00022-ge19049cf7d56-dirty torvalds#234 Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) Call Trace: dump_backtrace+0x1c/0x24 show_stack+0x2c/0x38 dump_stack_lvl+0x5a/0x72 dump_stack+0x14/0x1c __might_resched+0x130/0x13a rt_spin_lock+0x2a/0x5c die+0x24/0x112 do_trap_insn_illegal+0xa0/0xea _new_vmalloc_restore_context_a0+0xcc/0xd8 Oops - illegal instruction [#1] Switch to use raw_spinlock_t, which does not sleep even with PREEMPT_RT enabled. Fixes: 76d2a04 ("RISC-V: Init and Halt Code") Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2025
If GuC fails to load, the driver wedges, but in the process it tries to do stuff that may not be initialized yet. This moves the xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_init() to be done earlier: as its own doc says, it's a software-only initialization and should had been named with the _early() suffix. Move it to be called by xe_gt_init_early(), so the locks and seqno are initialized, avoiding a NULL ptr deref when wedging: xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* GT0: load failed: status: Reset = 0, BootROM = 0x50, UKernel = 0x00, MIA = 0x00, Auth = 0x01 xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* GT0: firmware signature verification failed xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* CRITICAL: Xe has declared device 0000:03:00.0 as wedged. ... BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 9 UID: 0 PID: 3908 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G U W 6.13.0-rc4-xe+ #3 Tainted: [U]=USER, [W]=WARN Hardware name: Intel Corporation Alder Lake Client Platform/AlderLake-S ADP-S DDR5 UDIMM CRB, BIOS ADLSFWI1.R00.3275.A00.2207010640 07/01/2022 RIP: 0010:xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_reset+0x75/0x110 [xe] This can be easily triggered by poking the GuC binary to force a signature failure. There will still be an extra message, xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* GT0: GuC mmio request 0x4100: no reply 0x4100 but that's better than a NULL ptr deref. Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/3956 Fixes: c9474b7 ("drm/xe: Wedge the entire device") Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 5001ef3) Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2025
Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] grafana/pyroscope#3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2025
[WARNING] There are several warnings about the recently introduced qgroup auto-removal that it triggers WARN_ON() for the non-zero rfer/excl numbers, e.g: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 67 PID: 2882 at fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:1854 btrfs_remove_qgroup+0x3df/0x450 CPU: 67 UID: 0 PID: 2882 Comm: btrfs-cleaner Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.11.6-300.fc41.x86_64 #1 RIP: 0010:btrfs_remove_qgroup+0x3df/0x450 Call Trace: <TASK> btrfs_qgroup_cleanup_dropped_subvolume+0x97/0xc0 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x44e/0xa80 btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xc3/0x110 cleaner_kthread+0xd8/0x130 kthread+0xd2/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- BTRFS warning (device sda): to be deleted qgroup 0/319 has non-zero numbers, rfer 258478080 rfer_cmpr 258478080 excl 0 excl_cmpr 0 [CAUSE] Although the root cause is still unclear, as if qgroup is consistent a fully dropped subvolume (with extra transaction committed) should lead to all zero numbers for the qgroup. My current guess is the subvolume drop triggered the new subtree drop threshold thus marked qgroup inconsistent, then rescan cleared it but some corner case is not properly handled during subvolume dropping. But at least for this particular case, since it's only the rfer/excl not properly reset to 0, and qgroup is already marked inconsistent, there is nothing to be worried for the end users. The user space tool utilizing qgroup would queue a rescan to handle everything, so the kernel wanring is a little overkilled. [ENHANCEMENT] Enhance the warning inside btrfs_remove_qgroup() by: - Only do WARN() if CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG is enabled As explained the kernel can handle inconsistent qgroups by simply do a rescan, there is nothing to bother the end users. - Treat the reserved space leak the same as non-zero numbers By outputting the values and trigger a WARN() if it's a debug build. So far I haven't experienced any case related to reserved space so I hope we will never need to bother them. Fixes: 839d6ea ("btrfs: automatically remove the subvolume qgroup") Link: kdave/btrfs-progs#922 Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2025
[BUG] When testing with COW fixup marked as BUG_ON() (this is involved with the new pin_user_pages*() change, which should not result new out-of-band dirty pages), I hit a crash triggered by the BUG_ON() from hitting COW fixup path. This BUG_ON() happens just after a failed btrfs_run_delalloc_range(): BTRFS error (device dm-2): failed to run delalloc range, root 348 ino 405 folio 65536 submit_bitmap 6-15 start 90112 len 106496: -28 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1444! Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 434621 Comm: kworker/u24:8 Tainted: G OE 6.12.0-rc7-custom+ torvalds#86 Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022 Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space [btrfs] pc : extent_writepage_io+0x2d4/0x308 [btrfs] lr : extent_writepage_io+0x2d4/0x308 [btrfs] Call trace: extent_writepage_io+0x2d4/0x308 [btrfs] extent_writepage+0x218/0x330 [btrfs] extent_write_cache_pages+0x1d4/0x4b0 [btrfs] btrfs_writepages+0x94/0x150 [btrfs] do_writepages+0x74/0x190 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x88/0xc8 start_delalloc_inodes+0x180/0x3b0 [btrfs] btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x174/0x280 [btrfs] shrink_delalloc+0x114/0x280 [btrfs] flush_space+0x250/0x2f8 [btrfs] btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x180/0x228 [btrfs] process_one_work+0x164/0x408 worker_thread+0x25c/0x388 kthread+0x100/0x118 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 Code: aa1403e1 9402f3ef aa1403e0 9402f36f (d4210000) ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [CAUSE] That failure is mostly from cow_file_range(), where we can hit -ENOSPC. Although the -ENOSPC is already a bug related to our space reservation code, let's just focus on the error handling. For example, we have the following dirty range [0, 64K) of an inode, with 4K sector size and 4K page size: 0 16K 32K 48K 64K |///////////////////////////////////////| |#######################################| Where |///| means page are still dirty, and |###| means the extent io tree has EXTENT_DELALLOC flag. - Enter extent_writepage() for page 0 - Enter btrfs_run_delalloc_range() for range [0, 64K) - Enter cow_file_range() for range [0, 64K) - Function btrfs_reserve_extent() only reserved one 16K extent So we created extent map and ordered extent for range [0, 16K) 0 16K 32K 48K 64K |////////|//////////////////////////////| |<- OE ->|##############################| And range [0, 16K) has its delalloc flag cleared. But since we haven't yet submit any bio, involved 4 pages are still dirty. - Function btrfs_reserve_extent() return with -ENOSPC Now we have to run error cleanup, which will clear all EXTENT_DELALLOC* flags and clear the dirty flags for the remaining ranges: 0 16K 32K 48K 64K |////////| | | | | Note that range [0, 16K) still has their pages dirty. - Some time later, writeback are triggered again for the range [0, 16K) since the page range still have dirty flags. - btrfs_run_delalloc_range() will do nothing because there is no EXTENT_DELALLOC flag. - extent_writepage_io() find page 0 has no ordered flag Which falls into the COW fixup path, triggering the BUG_ON(). Unfortunately this error handling bug dates back to the introduction of btrfs. Thankfully with the abuse of cow fixup, at least it won't crash the kernel. [FIX] Instead of immediately unlock the extent and folios, we keep the extent and folios locked until either erroring out or the whole delalloc range finished. When the whole delalloc range finished without error, we just unlock the whole range with PAGE_SET_ORDERED (and PAGE_UNLOCK for !keep_locked cases), with EXTENT_DELALLOC and EXTENT_LOCKED cleared. And those involved folios will be properly submitted, with their dirty flags cleared during submission. For the error path, it will be a little more complex: - The range with ordered extent allocated (range (1)) We only clear the EXTENT_DELALLOC and EXTENT_LOCKED, as the remaining flags are cleaned up by btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished()->btrfs_finish_one_ordered(). For folios we finish the IO (clear dirty, start writeback and immediately finish the writeback) and unlock the folios. - The range with reserved extent but no ordered extent (range(2)) - The range we never touched (range(3)) For both range (2) and range(3) the behavior is not changed. Now even if cow_file_range() failed halfway with some successfully reserved extents/ordered extents, we will keep all folios clean, so there will be no future writeback triggered on them. Cc: [email protected] Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2025
[BUG] With CONFIG_DEBUG_VM set, test case generic/476 has some chance to crash with the following VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(): BTRFS error (device dm-3): cow_file_range failed, start 1146880 end 1253375 len 106496 ret -28 BTRFS error (device dm-3): run_delalloc_nocow failed, start 1146880 end 1253375 len 106496 ret -28 page: refcount:4 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000592787cc index:0x12 pfn:0x10664 aops:btrfs_aops [btrfs] ino:101 dentry name(?):"f1774" flags: 0x2fffff80004028(uptodate|lru|private|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0xfffff) page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio)) ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at mm/page-writeback.c:2992! Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 3943513 Comm: kworker/u24:15 Tainted: G OE 6.12.0-rc7-custom+ torvalds#87 Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022 Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space [btrfs] pc : folio_clear_dirty_for_io+0x128/0x258 lr : folio_clear_dirty_for_io+0x128/0x258 Call trace: folio_clear_dirty_for_io+0x128/0x258 btrfs_folio_clamp_clear_dirty+0x80/0xd0 [btrfs] __process_folios_contig+0x154/0x268 [btrfs] extent_clear_unlock_delalloc+0x5c/0x80 [btrfs] run_delalloc_nocow+0x5f8/0x760 [btrfs] btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0xa8/0x220 [btrfs] writepage_delalloc+0x230/0x4c8 [btrfs] extent_writepage+0xb8/0x358 [btrfs] extent_write_cache_pages+0x21c/0x4e8 [btrfs] btrfs_writepages+0x94/0x150 [btrfs] do_writepages+0x74/0x190 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x88/0xc8 start_delalloc_inodes+0x178/0x3a8 [btrfs] btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x174/0x280 [btrfs] shrink_delalloc+0x114/0x280 [btrfs] flush_space+0x250/0x2f8 [btrfs] btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x180/0x228 [btrfs] process_one_work+0x164/0x408 worker_thread+0x25c/0x388 kthread+0x100/0x118 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 Code: 910a8021 a90363f7 a9046bf9 94012379 (d4210000) ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [CAUSE] The first two lines of extra debug messages show the problem is caused by the error handling of run_delalloc_nocow(). E.g. we have the following dirtied range (4K blocksize 4K page size): 0 16K 32K |//////////////////////////////////////| | Pre-allocated | And the range [0, 16K) has a preallocated extent. - Enter run_delalloc_nocow() for range [0, 16K) Which found range [0, 16K) is preallocated, can do the proper NOCOW write. - Enter fallback_to_fow() for range [16K, 32K) Since the range [16K, 32K) is not backed by preallocated extent, we have to go COW. - cow_file_range() failed for range [16K, 32K) So cow_file_range() will do the clean up by clearing folio dirty, unlock the folios. Now the folios in range [16K, 32K) is unlocked. - Enter extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() from run_delalloc_nocow() Which is called with PAGE_START_WRITEBACK to start page writeback. But folios can only be marked writeback when it's properly locked, thus this triggered the VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(). Furthermore there is another hidden but common bug that run_delalloc_nocow() is not clearing the folio dirty flags in its error handling path. This is the common bug shared between run_delalloc_nocow() and cow_file_range(). [FIX] - Clear folio dirty for range [@start, @cur_offset) Introduce a helper, cleanup_dirty_folios(), which will find and lock the folio in the range, clear the dirty flag and start/end the writeback, with the extra handling for the @locked_folio. - Introduce a helper to clear folio dirty, start and end writeback - Introduce a helper to record the last failed COW range end This is to trace which range we should skip, to avoid double unlocking. - Skip the failed COW range for the error handling Cc: [email protected] Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2025
[BUG] When testing with COW fixup marked as BUG_ON() (this is involved with the new pin_user_pages*() change, which should not result new out-of-band dirty pages), I hit a crash triggered by the BUG_ON() from hitting COW fixup path. This BUG_ON() happens just after a failed btrfs_run_delalloc_range(): BTRFS error (device dm-2): failed to run delalloc range, root 348 ino 405 folio 65536 submit_bitmap 6-15 start 90112 len 106496: -28 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1444! Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 434621 Comm: kworker/u24:8 Tainted: G OE 6.12.0-rc7-custom+ torvalds#86 Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022 Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space [btrfs] pc : extent_writepage_io+0x2d4/0x308 [btrfs] lr : extent_writepage_io+0x2d4/0x308 [btrfs] Call trace: extent_writepage_io+0x2d4/0x308 [btrfs] extent_writepage+0x218/0x330 [btrfs] extent_write_cache_pages+0x1d4/0x4b0 [btrfs] btrfs_writepages+0x94/0x150 [btrfs] do_writepages+0x74/0x190 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x88/0xc8 start_delalloc_inodes+0x180/0x3b0 [btrfs] btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x174/0x280 [btrfs] shrink_delalloc+0x114/0x280 [btrfs] flush_space+0x250/0x2f8 [btrfs] btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x180/0x228 [btrfs] process_one_work+0x164/0x408 worker_thread+0x25c/0x388 kthread+0x100/0x118 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 Code: aa1403e1 9402f3ef aa1403e0 9402f36f (d4210000) ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [CAUSE] That failure is mostly from cow_file_range(), where we can hit -ENOSPC. Although the -ENOSPC is already a bug related to our space reservation code, let's just focus on the error handling. For example, we have the following dirty range [0, 64K) of an inode, with 4K sector size and 4K page size: 0 16K 32K 48K 64K |///////////////////////////////////////| |#######################################| Where |///| means page are still dirty, and |###| means the extent io tree has EXTENT_DELALLOC flag. - Enter extent_writepage() for page 0 - Enter btrfs_run_delalloc_range() for range [0, 64K) - Enter cow_file_range() for range [0, 64K) - Function btrfs_reserve_extent() only reserved one 16K extent So we created extent map and ordered extent for range [0, 16K) 0 16K 32K 48K 64K |////////|//////////////////////////////| |<- OE ->|##############################| And range [0, 16K) has its delalloc flag cleared. But since we haven't yet submit any bio, involved 4 pages are still dirty. - Function btrfs_reserve_extent() returns with -ENOSPC Now we have to run error cleanup, which will clear all EXTENT_DELALLOC* flags and clear the dirty flags for the remaining ranges: 0 16K 32K 48K 64K |////////| | | | | Note that range [0, 16K) still has its pages dirty. - Some time later, writeback is triggered again for the range [0, 16K) since the page range still has dirty flags. - btrfs_run_delalloc_range() will do nothing because there is no EXTENT_DELALLOC flag. - extent_writepage_io() finds page 0 has no ordered flag Which falls into the COW fixup path, triggering the BUG_ON(). Unfortunately this error handling bug dates back to the introduction of btrfs. Thankfully with the abuse of COW fixup, at least it won't crash the kernel. [FIX] Instead of immediately unlocking the extent and folios, we keep the extent and folios locked until either erroring out or the whole delalloc range finished. When the whole delalloc range finished without error, we just unlock the whole range with PAGE_SET_ORDERED (and PAGE_UNLOCK for !keep_locked cases), with EXTENT_DELALLOC and EXTENT_LOCKED cleared. And the involved folios will be properly submitted, with their dirty flags cleared during submission. For the error path, it will be a little more complex: - The range with ordered extent allocated (range (1)) We only clear the EXTENT_DELALLOC and EXTENT_LOCKED, as the remaining flags are cleaned up by btrfs_mark_ordered_io_finished()->btrfs_finish_one_ordered(). For folios we finish the IO (clear dirty, start writeback and immediately finish the writeback) and unlock the folios. - The range with reserved extent but no ordered extent (range(2)) - The range we never touched (range(3)) For both range (2) and range(3) the behavior is not changed. Now even if cow_file_range() failed halfway with some successfully reserved extents/ordered extents, we will keep all folios clean, so there will be no future writeback triggered on them. CC: [email protected] Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2025
[BUG] With CONFIG_DEBUG_VM set, test case generic/476 has some chance to crash with the following VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(): BTRFS error (device dm-3): cow_file_range failed, start 1146880 end 1253375 len 106496 ret -28 BTRFS error (device dm-3): run_delalloc_nocow failed, start 1146880 end 1253375 len 106496 ret -28 page: refcount:4 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000592787cc index:0x12 pfn:0x10664 aops:btrfs_aops [btrfs] ino:101 dentry name(?):"f1774" flags: 0x2fffff80004028(uptodate|lru|private|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0xfffff) page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio)) ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at mm/page-writeback.c:2992! Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 3943513 Comm: kworker/u24:15 Tainted: G OE 6.12.0-rc7-custom+ torvalds#87 Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022 Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space [btrfs] pc : folio_clear_dirty_for_io+0x128/0x258 lr : folio_clear_dirty_for_io+0x128/0x258 Call trace: folio_clear_dirty_for_io+0x128/0x258 btrfs_folio_clamp_clear_dirty+0x80/0xd0 [btrfs] __process_folios_contig+0x154/0x268 [btrfs] extent_clear_unlock_delalloc+0x5c/0x80 [btrfs] run_delalloc_nocow+0x5f8/0x760 [btrfs] btrfs_run_delalloc_range+0xa8/0x220 [btrfs] writepage_delalloc+0x230/0x4c8 [btrfs] extent_writepage+0xb8/0x358 [btrfs] extent_write_cache_pages+0x21c/0x4e8 [btrfs] btrfs_writepages+0x94/0x150 [btrfs] do_writepages+0x74/0x190 filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x88/0xc8 start_delalloc_inodes+0x178/0x3a8 [btrfs] btrfs_start_delalloc_roots+0x174/0x280 [btrfs] shrink_delalloc+0x114/0x280 [btrfs] flush_space+0x250/0x2f8 [btrfs] btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x180/0x228 [btrfs] process_one_work+0x164/0x408 worker_thread+0x25c/0x388 kthread+0x100/0x118 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 Code: 910a8021 a90363f7 a9046bf9 94012379 (d4210000) ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [CAUSE] The first two lines of extra debug messages show the problem is caused by the error handling of run_delalloc_nocow(). E.g. we have the following dirtied range (4K blocksize 4K page size): 0 16K 32K |//////////////////////////////////////| | Pre-allocated | And the range [0, 16K) has a preallocated extent. - Enter run_delalloc_nocow() for range [0, 16K) Which found range [0, 16K) is preallocated, can do the proper NOCOW write. - Enter fallback_to_fow() for range [16K, 32K) Since the range [16K, 32K) is not backed by preallocated extent, we have to go COW. - cow_file_range() failed for range [16K, 32K) So cow_file_range() will do the clean up by clearing folio dirty, unlock the folios. Now the folios in range [16K, 32K) is unlocked. - Enter extent_clear_unlock_delalloc() from run_delalloc_nocow() Which is called with PAGE_START_WRITEBACK to start page writeback. But folios can only be marked writeback when it's properly locked, thus this triggered the VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(). Furthermore there is another hidden but common bug that run_delalloc_nocow() is not clearing the folio dirty flags in its error handling path. This is the common bug shared between run_delalloc_nocow() and cow_file_range(). [FIX] - Clear folio dirty for range [@start, @cur_offset) Introduce a helper, cleanup_dirty_folios(), which will find and lock the folio in the range, clear the dirty flag and start/end the writeback, with the extra handling for the @locked_folio. - Introduce a helper to clear folio dirty, start and end writeback - Introduce a helper to record the last failed COW range end This is to trace which range we should skip, to avoid double unlocking. - Skip the failed COW range for the error handling CC: [email protected] Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2025
Don't use btrfs_set_item_key_safe() to modify the keys in the RAID
stripe-tree, as this can lead to corruption of the tree, which is caught
by the checks in btrfs_set_item_key_safe():
BTRFS info (device nvme1n1): leaf 49168384 gen 15 total ptrs 194 free space 8329 owner 12
BTRFS info (device nvme1n1): refs 2 lock_owner 1030 current 1030
[ snip ]
item 105 key (354549760 230 20480) itemoff 14587 itemsize 16
stride 0 devid 5 physical 67502080
item 106 key (354631680 230 4096) itemoff 14571 itemsize 16
stride 0 devid 1 physical 88559616
item 107 key (354631680 230 32768) itemoff 14555 itemsize 16
stride 0 devid 1 physical 88555520
item 108 key (354717696 230 28672) itemoff 14539 itemsize 16
stride 0 devid 2 physical 67604480
[ snip ]
BTRFS critical (device nvme1n1): slot 106 key (354631680 230 32768) new key (354635776 230 4096)
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2602!
Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1055 Comm: fsstress Not tainted 6.13.0-rc1+ #1464
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-3-gd478f380-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0xf7/0x270
Code: <snip>
RSP: 0018:ffffc90001337ab0 EFLAGS: 00010287
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8881115fd000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
RBP: ffff888110ed6f50 R08: 00000000ffffefff R09: ffffffff8244c500
R10: 00000000ffffefff R11: 00000000ffffffff R12: ffff888100586000
R13: 00000000000000c9 R14: ffffc90001337b1f R15: ffff888110f23b58
FS: 00007f7d75c72740(0000) GS:ffff88813bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007fa811652c60 CR3: 0000000111398001 CR4: 0000000000370eb0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? __die_body.cold+0x14/0x1a
? die+0x2e/0x50
? do_trap+0xca/0x110
? do_error_trap+0x65/0x80
? btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0xf7/0x270
? exc_invalid_op+0x50/0x70
? btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0xf7/0x270
? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
? btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0xf7/0x270
btrfs_partially_delete_raid_extent+0xc4/0xe0
btrfs_delete_raid_extent+0x227/0x240
__btrfs_free_extent.isra.0+0x57f/0x9c0
? exc_coproc_segment_overrun+0x40/0x40
__btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x2fa/0xe80
btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x81/0xe0
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x2dd/0xbe0
? preempt_count_add+0x52/0xb0
btrfs_sync_file+0x375/0x4c0
do_fsync+0x39/0x70
__x64_sys_fsync+0x13/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x54/0x110
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
RIP: 0033:0x7f7d7550ef90
Code: <snip>
RSP: 002b:00007ffd70237248 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004a
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007f7d7550ef90
RDX: 000000000000013a RSI: 000000000040eb28 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 000000000000001b R08: 0000000000000078 R09: 00007ffd7023725c
R10: 00007f7d75400390 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 028f5c28f5c28f5c
R13: 8f5c28f5c28f5c29 R14: 000000000040b520 R15: 00007f7d75c726c8
</TASK>
While the root cause of the tree order corruption isn't clear, using
btrfs_duplicate_item() to copy the item and then adjusting both the key
and the per-device physical addresses is a safe way to counter this
problem.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2025
This reverts commit eaebeb9. Commit eaebeb9 ("mm: zswap: fix race between [de]compression and CPU hotunplug") used the CPU hotplug lock in zswap compress/decompress operations to protect against a race with CPU hotunplug making some per-CPU resources go away. However, zswap compress/decompress can be reached through reclaim while the lock is held, resulting in a potential deadlock as reported by syzbot: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.13.0-rc6-syzkaller-00006-g5428dc1906dd #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/89 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff8e7d2ed0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: acomp_ctx_get_cpu mm/zswap.c:886 [inline] ffffffff8e7d2ed0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: zswap_compress mm/zswap.c:908 [inline] ffffffff8e7d2ed0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: zswap_store_page mm/zswap.c:1439 [inline] ffffffff8e7d2ed0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}, at: zswap_store+0xa74/0x1ba0 mm/zswap.c:1546 but task is already holding lock: ffffffff8ea355a0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6871 [inline] ffffffff8ea355a0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kswapd+0xb58/0x2f30 mm/vmscan.c:7253 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 __fs_reclaim_acquire mm/page_alloc.c:3853 [inline] fs_reclaim_acquire+0x88/0x130 mm/page_alloc.c:3867 might_alloc include/linux/sched/mm.h:318 [inline] slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:4070 [inline] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:4148 [inline] __kmalloc_cache_node_noprof+0x40/0x3a0 mm/slub.c:4337 kmalloc_node_noprof include/linux/slab.h:924 [inline] alloc_worker kernel/workqueue.c:2638 [inline] create_worker+0x11b/0x720 kernel/workqueue.c:2781 workqueue_prepare_cpu+0xe3/0x170 kernel/workqueue.c:6628 cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x48d/0x830 kernel/cpu.c:194 __cpuhp_invoke_callback_range kernel/cpu.c:965 [inline] cpuhp_invoke_callback_range kernel/cpu.c:989 [inline] cpuhp_up_callbacks kernel/cpu.c:1020 [inline] _cpu_up+0x2b3/0x580 kernel/cpu.c:1690 cpu_up+0x184/0x230 kernel/cpu.c:1722 cpuhp_bringup_mask+0xdf/0x260 kernel/cpu.c:1788 cpuhp_bringup_cpus_parallel+0xf9/0x160 kernel/cpu.c:1878 bringup_nonboot_cpus+0x2b/0x50 kernel/cpu.c:1892 smp_init+0x34/0x150 kernel/smp.c:1009 kernel_init_freeable+0x417/0x5d0 init/main.c:1569 kernel_init+0x1d/0x2b0 init/main.c:1466 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 -> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock){++++}-{0:0}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline] validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904 __lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline] cpus_read_lock+0x42/0x150 kernel/cpu.c:490 acomp_ctx_get_cpu mm/zswap.c:886 [inline] zswap_compress mm/zswap.c:908 [inline] zswap_store_page mm/zswap.c:1439 [inline] zswap_store+0xa74/0x1ba0 mm/zswap.c:1546 swap_writepage+0x647/0xce0 mm/page_io.c:279 shmem_writepage+0x1248/0x1610 mm/shmem.c:1579 pageout mm/vmscan.c:696 [inline] shrink_folio_list+0x35ee/0x57e0 mm/vmscan.c:1374 shrink_inactive_list mm/vmscan.c:1967 [inline] shrink_list mm/vmscan.c:2205 [inline] shrink_lruvec+0x16db/0x2f30 mm/vmscan.c:5734 mem_cgroup_shrink_node+0x385/0x8e0 mm/vmscan.c:6575 mem_cgroup_soft_reclaim mm/memcontrol-v1.c:312 [inline] memcg1_soft_limit_reclaim+0x346/0x810 mm/memcontrol-v1.c:362 balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6975 [inline] kswapd+0x17b3/0x2f30 mm/vmscan.c:7253 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(cpu_hotplug_lock); lock(fs_reclaim); rlock(cpu_hotplug_lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by kswapd0/89: #0: ffffffff8ea355a0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6871 [inline] #0: ffffffff8ea355a0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: kswapd+0xb58/0x2f30 mm/vmscan.c:7253 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 89 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc6-syzkaller-00006-g5428dc1906dd #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/13/2024 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_circular_bug+0x13a/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2074 check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2206 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline] validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904 __lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline] cpus_read_lock+0x42/0x150 kernel/cpu.c:490 acomp_ctx_get_cpu mm/zswap.c:886 [inline] zswap_compress mm/zswap.c:908 [inline] zswap_store_page mm/zswap.c:1439 [inline] zswap_store+0xa74/0x1ba0 mm/zswap.c:1546 swap_writepage+0x647/0xce0 mm/page_io.c:279 shmem_writepage+0x1248/0x1610 mm/shmem.c:1579 pageout mm/vmscan.c:696 [inline] shrink_folio_list+0x35ee/0x57e0 mm/vmscan.c:1374 shrink_inactive_list mm/vmscan.c:1967 [inline] shrink_list mm/vmscan.c:2205 [inline] shrink_lruvec+0x16db/0x2f30 mm/vmscan.c:5734 mem_cgroup_shrink_node+0x385/0x8e0 mm/vmscan.c:6575 mem_cgroup_soft_reclaim mm/memcontrol-v1.c:312 [inline] memcg1_soft_limit_reclaim+0x346/0x810 mm/memcontrol-v1.c:362 balance_pgdat mm/vmscan.c:6975 [inline] kswapd+0x17b3/0x2f30 mm/vmscan.c:7253 kthread+0x2f0/0x390 kernel/kthread.c:389 ret_from_fork+0x4b/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:244 </TASK> Revert the change. A different fix for the race with CPU hotunplug will follow. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <[email protected]> Reported-by: syzbot <[email protected]> Cc: Barry Song <[email protected]> Cc: Chengming Zhou <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: Kanchana P Sridhar <[email protected]> Cc: Nhat Pham <[email protected]> Cc: Sam Sun <[email protected]> Cc: Vitaly Wool <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2025
A livepatch module can contain a special relocation section .klp.rela.<objname>.<secname> to apply its relocations at the appropriate time and to additionally access local and unexported symbols. When <objname> points to another module, such relocations are processed separately from the regular module relocation process. For instance, only when the target <objname> actually becomes loaded. With CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX, when the livepatch core decides to apply these relocations, their processing results in the following bug: [ 25.827238] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000000012ba [ 25.827819] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [ 25.828153] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page [ 25.828588] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ 25.829063] Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI [ 25.829742] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 452 Comm: insmod Tainted: G O K 6.13.0-rc4-00078-g059dd502b263 #7820 [ 25.830417] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [K]=LIVEPATCH [ 25.830768] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.0-20220807_005459-localhost 04/01/2014 [ 25.831651] RIP: 0010:memcmp+0x24/0x60 [ 25.832190] Code: [...] [ 25.833378] RSP: 0018:ffffa40b403a3ae8 EFLAGS: 00000246 [ 25.833637] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff93bc81d8e700 RCX: ffffffffc0202000 [ 25.834072] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 00000000000012ba [ 25.834548] RBP: ffffa40b403a3b68 R08: ffffa40b403a3b30 R09: 0000004a00000002 [ 25.835088] R10: ffffffffffffd222 R11: f000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 25.835666] R13: ffffffffc02032ba R14: ffffffffc007d1e0 R15: 0000000000000004 [ 25.836139] FS: 00007fecef8c3080(0000) GS:ffff93bc8f900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 25.836519] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 25.836977] CR2: 00000000000012ba CR3: 0000000002f24000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 [ 25.837442] Call Trace: [ 25.838297] <TASK> [ 25.841083] __write_relocate_add.constprop.0+0xc7/0x2b0 [ 25.841701] apply_relocate_add+0x75/0xa0 [ 25.841973] klp_write_section_relocs+0x10e/0x140 [ 25.842304] klp_write_object_relocs+0x70/0xa0 [ 25.842682] klp_init_object_loaded+0x21/0xf0 [ 25.842972] klp_enable_patch+0x43d/0x900 [ 25.843572] do_one_initcall+0x4c/0x220 [ 25.844186] do_init_module+0x6a/0x260 [ 25.844423] init_module_from_file+0x9c/0xe0 [ 25.844702] idempotent_init_module+0x172/0x270 [ 25.845008] __x64_sys_finit_module+0x69/0xc0 [ 25.845253] do_syscall_64+0x9e/0x1a0 [ 25.845498] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f [ 25.846056] RIP: 0033:0x7fecef9eb25d [ 25.846444] Code: [...] [ 25.847563] RSP: 002b:00007ffd0c5d6de8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000139 [ 25.848082] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055b03f05e470 RCX: 00007fecef9eb25d [ 25.848456] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000055b001e74e52 RDI: 0000000000000003 [ 25.848969] RBP: 00007ffd0c5d6ea0 R08: 0000000000000040 R09: 0000000000004100 [ 25.849411] R10: 00007fecefac7b20 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000055b001e74e52 [ 25.849905] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000055b03f05e440 R15: 0000000000000000 [ 25.850336] </TASK> [ 25.850553] Modules linked in: deku(OK+) uinput [ 25.851408] CR2: 00000000000012ba [ 25.852085] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- The problem is that the .klp.rela.<objname>.<secname> relocations are processed after the module was already formed and mod->rw_copy was reset. However, the code in __write_relocate_add() calls module_writable_address() which translates the target address 'loc' still to 'loc + (mem->rw_copy - mem->base)', with mem->rw_copy now being 0. Fix the problem by returning directly 'loc' in module_writable_address() when the module is already formed. Function __write_relocate_add() knows to use text_poke() in such a case. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Fixes: 0c133b1 ("module: prepare to handle ROX allocations for text") Signed-off-by: Petr Pavlu <[email protected]> Reported-by: Marek Maslanka <[email protected]> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-modules/CAGcaFA2hdThQV6mjD_1_U+GNHThv84+MQvMWLgEuX+LVbAyDxg@mail.gmail.com/ Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <[email protected]> Tested-by: Petr Mladek <[email protected]> Cc: Joe Lawrence <[email protected]> Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]> Cc: Luis Chamberlain <[email protected]> Cc: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <[email protected]> Cc: Petr Mladek <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 14, 2025
Don't use btrfs_set_item_key_safe() to modify the keys in the RAID
stripe-tree, as this can lead to corruption of the tree, which is caught
by the checks in btrfs_set_item_key_safe():
BTRFS info (device nvme1n1): leaf 49168384 gen 15 total ptrs 194 free space 8329 owner 12
BTRFS info (device nvme1n1): refs 2 lock_owner 1030 current 1030
[ snip ]
item 105 key (354549760 230 20480) itemoff 14587 itemsize 16
stride 0 devid 5 physical 67502080
item 106 key (354631680 230 4096) itemoff 14571 itemsize 16
stride 0 devid 1 physical 88559616
item 107 key (354631680 230 32768) itemoff 14555 itemsize 16
stride 0 devid 1 physical 88555520
item 108 key (354717696 230 28672) itemoff 14539 itemsize 16
stride 0 devid 2 physical 67604480
[ snip ]
BTRFS critical (device nvme1n1): slot 106 key (354631680 230 32768) new key (354635776 230 4096)
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2602!
Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 1055 Comm: fsstress Not tainted 6.13.0-rc1+ #1464
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-3-gd478f380-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0xf7/0x270
Code: <snip>
RSP: 0018:ffffc90001337ab0 EFLAGS: 00010287
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8881115fd000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
RBP: ffff888110ed6f50 R08: 00000000ffffefff R09: ffffffff8244c500
R10: 00000000ffffefff R11: 00000000ffffffff R12: ffff888100586000
R13: 00000000000000c9 R14: ffffc90001337b1f R15: ffff888110f23b58
FS: 00007f7d75c72740(0000) GS:ffff88813bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007fa811652c60 CR3: 0000000111398001 CR4: 0000000000370eb0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
? __die_body.cold+0x14/0x1a
? die+0x2e/0x50
? do_trap+0xca/0x110
? do_error_trap+0x65/0x80
? btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0xf7/0x270
? exc_invalid_op+0x50/0x70
? btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0xf7/0x270
? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
? btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0xf7/0x270
btrfs_partially_delete_raid_extent+0xc4/0xe0
btrfs_delete_raid_extent+0x227/0x240
__btrfs_free_extent.isra.0+0x57f/0x9c0
? exc_coproc_segment_overrun+0x40/0x40
__btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x2fa/0xe80
btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x81/0xe0
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x2dd/0xbe0
? preempt_count_add+0x52/0xb0
btrfs_sync_file+0x375/0x4c0
do_fsync+0x39/0x70
__x64_sys_fsync+0x13/0x20
do_syscall_64+0x54/0x110
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
RIP: 0033:0x7f7d7550ef90
Code: <snip>
RSP: 002b:00007ffd70237248 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004a
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: 00007f7d7550ef90
RDX: 000000000000013a RSI: 000000000040eb28 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 000000000000001b R08: 0000000000000078 R09: 00007ffd7023725c
R10: 00007f7d75400390 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 028f5c28f5c28f5c
R13: 8f5c28f5c28f5c29 R14: 000000000040b520 R15: 00007f7d75c726c8
</TASK>
While the root cause of the tree order corruption isn't clear, using
btrfs_duplicate_item() to copy the item and then adjusting both the key
and the per-device physical addresses is a safe way to counter this
problem.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 16, 2025
In mana_driver_exit(), mana_debugfs_root gets cleanup before any of it's children (which happens later in the pci_unregister_driver()). Due to this, when mana driver is configured as a module and rmmod is invoked, following stack gets printed along with failure in rmmod command. [ 2399.317651] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000098 [ 2399.318657] #PF: supervisor write access in kernel mode [ 2399.319057] #PF: error_code(0x0002) - not-present page [ 2399.319528] PGD 10eb68067 P4D 0 [ 2399.319914] Oops: Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP NOPTI [ 2399.320308] CPU: 72 UID: 0 PID: 5815 Comm: rmmod Not tainted 6.13.0-rc5+ torvalds#89 [ 2399.320986] Hardware name: Microsoft Corporation Virtual Machine/Virtual Machine, BIOS Hyper-V UEFI Release v4.1 09/28/2024 [ 2399.321892] RIP: 0010:down_write+0x1a/0x50 [ 2399.322303] Code: 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 89 e5 41 54 49 89 fc e8 9d cd ff ff 31 c0 ba 01 00 00 00 <f0> 49 0f b1 14 24 75 17 65 48 8b 05 f6 84 dd 5f 49 89 44 24 08 4c [ 2399.323669] RSP: 0018:ff53859d6c663a70 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 2399.324061] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ff1d4eb505060180 RCX: ffffff8100000000 [ 2399.324620] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000064 RDI: 0000000000000098 [ 2399.325167] RBP: ff53859d6c663a78 R08: 00000000000009c4 R09: ff1d4eb4fac90000 [ 2399.325681] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 0000000000000098 [ 2399.326185] R13: ff1d4e42e1a4a0c8 R14: ff1d4eb538ce0000 R15: 0000000000000098 [ 2399.326755] FS: 00007fe729570000(0000) GS:ff1d4eb2b7200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 2399.327269] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 2399.327690] CR2: 0000000000000098 CR3: 00000001c0584005 CR4: 0000000000373ef0 [ 2399.328166] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 2399.328623] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe07f0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 2399.329055] Call Trace: [ 2399.329243] <TASK> [ 2399.329379] ? show_regs+0x69/0x80 [ 2399.329602] ? __die+0x25/0x70 [ 2399.329856] ? page_fault_oops+0x271/0x550 [ 2399.330088] ? psi_group_change+0x217/0x470 [ 2399.330341] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x455/0x7b0 [ 2399.330667] ? finish_task_switch.isra.0+0x91/0x2f0 [ 2399.331004] ? exc_page_fault+0x73/0x160 [ 2399.331275] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x27/0x30 [ 2399.343324] ? down_write+0x1a/0x50 [ 2399.343631] simple_recursive_removal+0x4d/0x2c0 [ 2399.343977] ? __pfx_remove_one+0x10/0x10 [ 2399.344251] debugfs_remove+0x45/0x70 [ 2399.344511] mana_destroy_rxq+0x44/0x400 [mana] [ 2399.344845] mana_destroy_vport+0x54/0x1c0 [mana] [ 2399.345229] mana_detach+0x2f1/0x4e0 [mana] [ 2399.345466] ? ida_free+0x150/0x160 [ 2399.345718] ? __cond_resched+0x1a/0x50 [ 2399.345987] mana_remove+0xf4/0x1a0 [mana] [ 2399.346243] mana_gd_remove+0x25/0x80 [mana] [ 2399.346605] pci_device_remove+0x41/0xb0 [ 2399.346878] device_remove+0x46/0x70 [ 2399.347150] device_release_driver_internal+0x1e3/0x250 [ 2399.347831] ? klist_remove+0x81/0xe0 [ 2399.348377] driver_detach+0x4b/0xa0 [ 2399.348906] bus_remove_driver+0x83/0x100 [ 2399.349435] driver_unregister+0x31/0x60 [ 2399.349919] pci_unregister_driver+0x40/0x90 [ 2399.350492] mana_driver_exit+0x1c/0xb50 [mana] [ 2399.351102] __do_sys_delete_module.constprop.0+0x184/0x320 [ 2399.351664] ? __fput+0x1a9/0x2d0 [ 2399.352200] __x64_sys_delete_module+0x12/0x20 [ 2399.352760] x64_sys_call+0x1e66/0x2140 [ 2399.353316] do_syscall_64+0x79/0x150 [ 2399.353813] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x49/0x230 [ 2399.354346] ? do_syscall_64+0x85/0x150 [ 2399.354816] ? irqentry_exit+0x1d/0x30 [ 2399.355287] ? exc_page_fault+0x7f/0x160 [ 2399.355756] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ 2399.356302] RIP: 0033:0x7fe728d26aeb [ 2399.356776] Code: 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 45 33 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa b8 b0 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 15 33 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [ 2399.358372] RSP: 002b:00007ffff954d6f8 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0 [ 2399.359066] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005609156cc760 RCX: 00007fe728d26aeb [ 2399.359779] RDX: 000000000000000a RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 00005609156cc7c8 [ 2399.360535] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ 2399.361261] R10: 00007fe728dbeac0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 00007ffff954d950 [ 2399.361952] R13: 00005609156cc2a0 R14: 00007ffff954ee5f R15: 00005609156cc760 [ 2399.362688] </TASK> Fixes: 6607c17 ("net: mana: Enable debugfs files for MANA device") Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Shradha Gupta <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Michal Swiatkowski <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 16, 2025
Some of the core functions can only be called if the transport
has been assigned.
As Michal reported, a socket might have the transport at NULL,
for example after a failed connect(), causing the following trace:
BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 00000000000000a0
#PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
#PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
PGD 12faf8067 P4D 12faf8067 PUD 113670067 PMD 0
Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
CPU: 15 UID: 0 PID: 1198 Comm: a.out Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2+
RIP: 0010:vsock_connectible_has_data+0x1f/0x40
Call Trace:
vsock_bpf_recvmsg+0xca/0x5e0
sock_recvmsg+0xb9/0xc0
__sys_recvfrom+0xb3/0x130
__x64_sys_recvfrom+0x20/0x30
do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
So we need to check the `vsk->transport` in vsock_bpf_recvmsg(),
especially for connected sockets (stream/seqpacket) as we already
do in __vsock_connectible_recvmsg().
Fixes: 634f1a7 ("vsock: support sockmap")
Cc: [email protected]
Reported-by: Michal Luczaj <[email protected]>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/
Tested-by: Michal Luczaj <[email protected]>
Reported-by: [email protected]
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/[email protected]/
Tested-by: [email protected]
Reviewed-by: Hyunwoo Kim <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Luigi Leonardi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 16, 2025
Fix a lockdep warning [1] observed during the write combining test.
The warning indicates a potential nested lock scenario that could lead
to a deadlock.
However, this is a false positive alarm because the SF lock and its
parent lock are distinct ones.
The lockdep confusion arises because the locks belong to the same object
class (i.e., struct mlx5_core_dev).
To resolve this, the code has been refactored to avoid taking both
locks. Instead, only the parent lock is acquired.
[1]
raw_ethernet_bw/2118 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 213.619032] ffff88811dd75e08 (&dev->wc_state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.620270]
[ 213.620270] but task is already holding lock:
[ 213.620943] ffff88810b585e08 (&dev->wc_state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at:
mlx5_wc_support_get+0x10c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.622045]
[ 213.622045] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 213.622778] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 213.622778]
[ 213.623465] CPU0
[ 213.623815] ----
[ 213.624148] lock(&dev->wc_state_lock);
[ 213.624615] lock(&dev->wc_state_lock);
[ 213.625071]
[ 213.625071] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 213.625071]
[ 213.625805] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[ 213.625805]
[ 213.626522] 4 locks held by raw_ethernet_bw/2118:
[ 213.627019] #0: ffff88813f80d578 (&uverbs_dev->disassociate_srcu){.+.+}-{0:0},
at: ib_uverbs_ioctl+0xc4/0x170 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.628088] #1: ffff88810fb23930 (&file->hw_destroy_rwsem){.+.+}-{3:3},
at: ib_init_ucontext+0x2d/0xf0 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.629094] #2: ffff88810fb23878 (&file->ucontext_lock){+.+.}-{3:3},
at: ib_init_ucontext+0x49/0xf0 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.630106] #3: ffff88810b585e08 (&dev->wc_state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3},
at: mlx5_wc_support_get+0x10c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.631185]
[ 213.631185] stack backtrace:
[ 213.631718] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 2118 Comm: raw_ethernet_bw Not tainted
6.12.0-rc7_internal_net_next_mlx5_89a0ad0 #1
[ 213.632722] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS
rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[ 213.633785] Call Trace:
[ 213.634099]
[ 213.634393] dump_stack_lvl+0x7e/0xc0
[ 213.634806] print_deadlock_bug+0x278/0x3c0
[ 213.635265] __lock_acquire+0x15f4/0x2c40
[ 213.635712] lock_acquire+0xcd/0x2d0
[ 213.636120] ? mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.636722] ? mlx5_ib_enable_lb+0x24/0xa0 [mlx5_ib]
[ 213.637277] __mutex_lock+0x81/0xda0
[ 213.637697] ? mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.638305] ? mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.638902] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x70
[ 213.639400] ? mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.640016] mlx5_wc_support_get+0x18c/0x210 [mlx5_core]
[ 213.640615] set_ucontext_resp+0x68/0x2b0 [mlx5_ib]
[ 213.641144] ? debug_mutex_init+0x33/0x40
[ 213.641586] mlx5_ib_alloc_ucontext+0x18e/0x7b0 [mlx5_ib]
[ 213.642145] ib_init_ucontext+0xa0/0xf0 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.642679] ib_uverbs_handler_UVERBS_METHOD_GET_CONTEXT+0x95/0xc0
[ib_uverbs]
[ 213.643426] ? _copy_from_user+0x46/0x80
[ 213.643878] ib_uverbs_cmd_verbs+0xa6b/0xc80 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.644426] ? ib_uverbs_handler_UVERBS_METHOD_INVOKE_WRITE+0x130/0x130
[ib_uverbs]
[ 213.645213] ? __lock_acquire+0xa99/0x2c40
[ 213.645675] ? lock_acquire+0xcd/0x2d0
[ 213.646101] ? ib_uverbs_ioctl+0xc4/0x170 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.646625] ? reacquire_held_locks+0xcf/0x1f0
[ 213.647102] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x45d/0x770
[ 213.647586] ib_uverbs_ioctl+0xe0/0x170 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.648102] ? ib_uverbs_ioctl+0xc4/0x170 [ib_uverbs]
[ 213.648632] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x4d3/0xaa0
[ 213.649060] ? do_user_addr_fault+0x4a8/0x770
[ 213.649528] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140
[ 213.649947] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
[ 213.650478] RIP: 0033:0x7fa179b0737b
[ 213.650893] Code: ff ff ff 85 c0 79 9b 49 c7 c4 ff ff ff ff 5b 5d 4c
89 e0 41 5c c3 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa b8
10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d
7d 2a 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[ 213.652619] RSP: 002b:00007ffd2e6d46e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX:
0000000000000010
[ 213.653390] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffd2e6d47f8 RCX:
00007fa179b0737b
[ 213.654084] RDX: 00007ffd2e6d47e0 RSI: 00000000c0181b01 RDI:
0000000000000003
[ 213.654767] RBP: 00007ffd2e6d47c0 R08: 00007fa1799be010 R09:
0000000000000002
[ 213.655453] R10: 00007ffd2e6d4960 R11: 0000000000000246 R12:
00007ffd2e6d487c
[ 213.656170] R13: 0000000000000027 R14: 0000000000000001 R15:
00007ffd2e6d4f70
Fixes: d98995b ("net/mlx5: Reimplement write combining test")
Signed-off-by: Yishai Hadas <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Michael Guralnik <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Larysa Zaremba <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 16, 2025
Clear the port select structure on error so no stale values left after
definers are destroyed. That's because the mlx5_lag_destroy_definers()
always try to destroy all lag definers in the tt_map, so in the flow
below lag definers get double-destroyed and cause kernel crash:
mlx5_lag_port_sel_create()
mlx5_lag_create_definers()
mlx5_lag_create_definer() <- Failed on tt 1
mlx5_lag_destroy_definers() <- definers[tt=0] gets destroyed
mlx5_lag_port_sel_create()
mlx5_lag_create_definers()
mlx5_lag_create_definer() <- Failed on tt 0
mlx5_lag_destroy_definers() <- definers[tt=0] gets double-destroyed
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000008
Mem abort info:
ESR = 0x0000000096000005
EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
SET = 0, FnV = 0
EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
FSC = 0x05: level 1 translation fault
Data abort info:
ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000005, ISS2 = 0x00000000
CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0
GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0
user pgtable: 64k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000112ce2e00
[0000000000000008] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000, pud=0000000000000000
Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000005 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: iptable_raw bonding ip_gre ip6_gre gre ip6_tunnel tunnel6 geneve ip6_udp_tunnel udp_tunnel ipip tunnel4 ip_tunnel rdma_ucm(OE) rdma_cm(OE) iw_cm(OE) ib_ipoib(OE) ib_cm(OE) ib_umad(OE) mlx5_ib(OE) ib_uverbs(OE) mlx5_fwctl(OE) fwctl(OE) mlx5_core(OE) mlxdevm(OE) ib_core(OE) mlxfw(OE) memtrack(OE) mlx_compat(OE) openvswitch nsh nf_conncount psample xt_conntrack xt_MASQUERADE nf_conntrack_netlink nfnetlink xfrm_user xfrm_algo xt_addrtype iptable_filter iptable_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 br_netfilter bridge stp llc netconsole overlay efi_pstore sch_fq_codel zram ip_tables crct10dif_ce qemu_fw_cfg fuse ipv6 crc_ccitt [last unloaded: mlx_compat(OE)]
CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 217 Comm: kworker/u53:2 Tainted: G OE 6.11.0+ #2
Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE, [E]=UNSIGNED_MODULE
Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
Workqueue: mlx5_lag mlx5_do_bond_work [mlx5_core]
pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : mlx5_del_flow_rules+0x24/0x2c0 [mlx5_core]
lr : mlx5_lag_destroy_definer+0x54/0x100 [mlx5_core]
sp : ffff800085fafb00
x29: ffff800085fafb00 x28: ffff0000da0c8000 x27: 0000000000000000
x26: ffff0000da0c8000 x25: ffff0000da0c8000 x24: ffff0000da0c8000
x23: ffff0000c31f81a0 x22: 0400000000000000 x21: ffff0000da0c8000
x20: 0000000000000000 x19: 0000000000000001 x18: 0000000000000000
x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000ffff8b0c9350
x14: 0000000000000000 x13: ffff800081390d18 x12: ffff800081dc3cc0
x11: 0000000000000001 x10: 0000000000000b10 x9 : ffff80007ab7304c
x8 : ffff0000d00711f0 x7 : 0000000000000004 x6 : 0000000000000190
x5 : ffff00027edb3010 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000
x2 : ffff0000d39b8000 x1 : ffff0000d39b8000 x0 : 0400000000000000
Call trace:
mlx5_del_flow_rules+0x24/0x2c0 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_lag_destroy_definer+0x54/0x100 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_lag_destroy_definers+0xa0/0x108 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_lag_port_sel_create+0x2d4/0x6f8 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_activate_lag+0x60c/0x6f8 [mlx5_core]
mlx5_do_bond_work+0x284/0x5c8 [mlx5_core]
process_one_work+0x170/0x3e0
worker_thread+0x2d8/0x3e0
kthread+0x11c/0x128
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
Code: a9025bf5 aa0003f6 a90363f7 f90023f9 (f9400400)
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
Fixes: dc48516 ("net/mlx5: Lag, add support to create definers for LAG")
Signed-off-by: Mark Zhang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 16, 2025
Attempt to enable IPsec packet offload in tunnel mode in debug kernel generates the following kernel panic, which is happening due to two issues: 1. In SA add section, the should be _bh() variant when marking SA mode. 2. There is not needed flush_workqueue in SA delete routine. It is not needed as at this stage as it is removed from SADB and the running work will be canceled later in SA free. ===================================================== WARNING: SOFTIRQ-safe -> SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock order detected 6.12.0+ #4 Not tainted ----------------------------------------------------- charon/1337 [HC0[0]:SC0[4]:HE1:SE0] is trying to acquire: ffff88810f365020 (&xa->xa_lock#24){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_xfrm_del_state+0xca/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] and this task is already holding: ffff88813e0f0d48 (&x->lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: xfrm_state_delete+0x16/0x30 which would create a new lock dependency: (&x->lock){+.-.}-{3:3} -> (&xa->xa_lock#24){+.+.}-{3:3} but this new dependency connects a SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock: (&x->lock){+.-.}-{3:3} ... which became SOFTIRQ-irq-safe at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 xfrm_timer_handler+0x91/0xd70 __hrtimer_run_queues+0x1dd/0xa60 hrtimer_run_softirq+0x146/0x2e0 handle_softirqs+0x266/0x860 irq_exit_rcu+0x115/0x1a0 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x90 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20 default_idle+0x13/0x20 default_idle_call+0x67/0xa0 do_idle+0x2da/0x320 cpu_startup_entry+0x50/0x60 start_secondary+0x213/0x2a0 common_startup_64+0x129/0x138 to a SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe lock: (&xa->xa_lock#24){+.+.}-{3:3} ... which became SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe at: ... lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40 xa_set_mark+0x70/0x110 mlx5e_xfrm_add_state+0xe48/0x2290 [mlx5_core] xfrm_dev_state_add+0x3bb/0xd70 xfrm_add_sa+0x2451/0x4a90 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 other info that might help us debug this: Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&xa->xa_lock#24); local_irq_disable(); lock(&x->lock); lock(&xa->xa_lock#24); <Interrupt> lock(&x->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 2 locks held by charon/1337: #0: ffffffff87f8f858 (&net->xfrm.xfrm_cfg_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x5e/0x90 #1: ffff88813e0f0d48 (&x->lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: xfrm_state_delete+0x16/0x30 the dependencies between SOFTIRQ-irq-safe lock and the holding lock: -> (&x->lock){+.-.}-{3:3} ops: 29 { HARDIRQ-ON-W at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 xfrm_alloc_spi+0xc0/0xe60 xfrm_alloc_userspi+0x5f6/0xbc0 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 IN-SOFTIRQ-W at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 xfrm_timer_handler+0x91/0xd70 __hrtimer_run_queues+0x1dd/0xa60 hrtimer_run_softirq+0x146/0x2e0 handle_softirqs+0x266/0x860 irq_exit_rcu+0x115/0x1a0 sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6e/0x90 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20 default_idle+0x13/0x20 default_idle_call+0x67/0xa0 do_idle+0x2da/0x320 cpu_startup_entry+0x50/0x60 start_secondary+0x213/0x2a0 common_startup_64+0x129/0x138 INITIAL USE at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 xfrm_alloc_spi+0xc0/0xe60 xfrm_alloc_userspi+0x5f6/0xbc0 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 } ... key at: [<ffffffff87f9cd20>] __key.18+0x0/0x40 the dependencies between the lock to be acquired and SOFTIRQ-irq-unsafe lock: -> (&xa->xa_lock#24){+.+.}-{3:3} ops: 9 { HARDIRQ-ON-W at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 mlx5e_xfrm_add_state+0xc5b/0x2290 [mlx5_core] xfrm_dev_state_add+0x3bb/0xd70 xfrm_add_sa+0x2451/0x4a90 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 SOFTIRQ-ON-W at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40 xa_set_mark+0x70/0x110 mlx5e_xfrm_add_state+0xe48/0x2290 [mlx5_core] xfrm_dev_state_add+0x3bb/0xd70 xfrm_add_sa+0x2451/0x4a90 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 INITIAL USE at: lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 mlx5e_xfrm_add_state+0xc5b/0x2290 [mlx5_core] xfrm_dev_state_add+0x3bb/0xd70 xfrm_add_sa+0x2451/0x4a90 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 } ... key at: [<ffffffffa078ff60>] __key.48+0x0/0xfffffffffff210a0 [mlx5_core] ... acquired at: __lock_acquire+0x30a0/0x5040 lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 mlx5e_xfrm_del_state+0xca/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] xfrm_dev_state_delete+0x90/0x160 __xfrm_state_delete+0x662/0xae0 xfrm_state_delete+0x1e/0x30 xfrm_del_sa+0x1c2/0x340 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 stack backtrace: CPU: 7 UID: 0 PID: 1337 Comm: charon Not tainted 6.12.0+ #4 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x74/0xd0 check_irq_usage+0x12e8/0x1d90 ? print_shortest_lock_dependencies_backwards+0x1b0/0x1b0 ? check_chain_key+0x1bb/0x4c0 ? __lockdep_reset_lock+0x180/0x180 ? check_path.constprop.0+0x24/0x50 ? mark_lock+0x108/0x2fb0 ? print_circular_bug+0x9b0/0x9b0 ? mark_lock+0x108/0x2fb0 ? print_usage_bug.part.0+0x670/0x670 ? check_prev_add+0x1c4/0x2310 check_prev_add+0x1c4/0x2310 __lock_acquire+0x30a0/0x5040 ? lockdep_set_lock_cmp_fn+0x190/0x190 ? lockdep_set_lock_cmp_fn+0x190/0x190 lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 ? mlx5e_xfrm_del_state+0xca/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x400/0x400 ? __xfrm_state_delete+0x5f0/0xae0 ? lock_downgrade+0x6b0/0x6b0 _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x34/0x40 ? mlx5e_xfrm_del_state+0xca/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_xfrm_del_state+0xca/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] xfrm_dev_state_delete+0x90/0x160 __xfrm_state_delete+0x662/0xae0 xfrm_state_delete+0x1e/0x30 xfrm_del_sa+0x1c2/0x340 ? xfrm_get_sa+0x250/0x250 ? check_chain_key+0x1bb/0x4c0 xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x493/0x880 ? copy_sec_ctx+0x270/0x270 ? check_chain_key+0x1bb/0x4c0 ? lockdep_set_lock_cmp_fn+0x190/0x190 ? lockdep_set_lock_cmp_fn+0x190/0x190 netlink_rcv_skb+0x12e/0x380 ? copy_sec_ctx+0x270/0x270 ? netlink_ack+0xd90/0xd90 ? netlink_deliver_tap+0xcd/0xb60 xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x6d/0x90 netlink_unicast+0x42f/0x740 ? netlink_attachskb+0x730/0x730 ? lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 netlink_sendmsg+0x745/0xbe0 ? netlink_unicast+0x740/0x740 ? __might_fault+0xbb/0x170 ? netlink_unicast+0x740/0x740 __sock_sendmsg+0xc5/0x190 ? fdget+0x163/0x1d0 __sys_sendto+0x1fe/0x2c0 ? __x64_sys_getpeername+0xb0/0xb0 ? do_user_addr_fault+0x856/0xe30 ? lock_acquire+0x1be/0x520 ? __task_pid_nr_ns+0x117/0x410 ? lock_downgrade+0x6b0/0x6b0 __x64_sys_sendto+0xdc/0x1b0 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x284/0x400 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7f7d31291ba4 Code: 7d e8 89 4d d4 e8 4c 42 f7 ff 44 8b 4d d0 4c 8b 45 c8 89 c3 44 8b 55 d4 8b 7d e8 b8 2c 00 00 00 48 8b 55 d8 48 8b 75 e0 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 34 89 df 48 89 45 e8 e8 99 42 f7 ff 48 8b 45 RSP: 002b:00007f7d2ccd94f0 EFLAGS: 00000297 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: 00007f7d31291ba4 RDX: 0000000000000028 RSI: 00007f7d2ccd96a0 RDI: 000000000000000a RBP: 00007f7d2ccd9530 R08: 00007f7d2ccd9598 R09: 000000000000000c R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000297 R12: 0000000000000028 R13: 00007f7d2ccd9598 R14: 00007f7d2ccd96a0 R15: 00000000000000e1 </TASK> Fixes: 4c24272 ("net/mlx5e: Listen to ARP events to update IPsec L2 headers in tunnel mode") Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 17, 2025
This commit addresses a circular locking dependency issue within the GFX isolation mechanism. The problem was identified by a warning indicating a potential deadlock due to inconsistent lock acquisition order. - The `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use` and `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_end_use` functions previously acquired `enforce_isolation_mutex` and called `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl`, leading to potential deadlocks. ie., If `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` is called while `enforce_isolation_mutex` is held, and `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_handler` is called while `kfd_sch_mutex` is held, it can create a circular dependency. By ensuring consistent lock usage, this fix resolves the issue: [ 606.297333] ====================================================== [ 606.297343] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 606.297353] 6.10.0-amd-mlkd-610-311224-lof torvalds#19 Tainted: G OE [ 606.297365] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 606.297375] kworker/u96:3/3825 is trying to acquire lock: [ 606.297385] ffff9aa64e431cb8 ((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.297413] but task is already holding lock: [ 606.297423] ffff9aa64e432338 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.297725] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 606.297738] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 606.297749] -> #2 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 606.297765] __mutex_lock+0x85/0x930 [ 606.297776] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 606.297786] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298007] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298225] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 606.298412] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298603] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu] [ 606.298866] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched] [ 606.298880] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.298890] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.298899] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.298908] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.298919] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.298929] -> #1 (&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 606.298947] __mutex_lock+0x85/0x930 [ 606.298956] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30 [ 606.298966] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_handler+0x87/0x370 [amdgpu] [ 606.299190] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.299199] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.299208] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.299217] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.299227] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.299236] -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: [ 606.299257] __lock_acquire+0x16f9/0x2810 [ 606.299267] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300 [ 606.299276] __flush_work+0x250/0x610 [ 606.299286] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x71/0x80 [ 606.299296] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x287/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.299509] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.299723] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 606.299909] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu] [ 606.300101] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu] [ 606.300355] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched] [ 606.300369] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.300378] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.300387] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.300396] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.300406] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.300416] other info that might help us debug this: [ 606.300428] Chain exists of: (work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work) --> &adev->enforce_isolation_mutex --> &adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex [ 606.300458] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 606.300468] CPU0 CPU1 [ 606.300476] ---- ---- [ 606.300484] lock(&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex); [ 606.300494] lock(&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex); [ 606.300508] lock(&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex); [ 606.300521] lock((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)); [ 606.300536] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 606.300546] 5 locks held by kworker/u96:3/3825: [ 606.300555] #0: ffff9aa5aa1f5d58 ((wq_completion)comp_1.1.0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x3f5/0x680 [ 606.300577] #1: ffffaa53c3c97e40 ((work_completion)(&sched->work_run_job)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d6/0x680 [ 606.300600] #2: ffff9aa64e463c98 (&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x1c3/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.300837] #3: ffff9aa64e432338 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.301062] #4: ffffffff8c1a5660 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __flush_work+0x70/0x610 [ 606.301083] stack backtrace: [ 606.301092] CPU: 14 PID: 3825 Comm: kworker/u96:3 Tainted: G OE 6.10.0-amd-mlkd-610-311224-lof torvalds#19 [ 606.301109] Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. X570S GAMING X/X570S GAMING X, BIOS F7 03/22/2024 [ 606.301124] Workqueue: comp_1.1.0 drm_sched_run_job_work [gpu_sched] [ 606.301140] Call Trace: [ 606.301146] <TASK> [ 606.301154] dump_stack_lvl+0x9b/0xf0 [ 606.301166] dump_stack+0x10/0x20 [ 606.301175] print_circular_bug+0x26c/0x340 [ 606.301187] check_noncircular+0x157/0x170 [ 606.301197] ? register_lock_class+0x48/0x490 [ 606.301213] __lock_acquire+0x16f9/0x2810 [ 606.301230] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300 [ 606.301239] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.301250] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 606.301261] ? mark_held_locks+0x54/0x90 [ 606.301274] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.301284] __flush_work+0x250/0x610 [ 606.301293] ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610 [ 606.301305] ? __pfx_wq_barrier_func+0x10/0x10 [ 606.301318] ? mark_held_locks+0x54/0x90 [ 606.301331] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 606.301345] cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x71/0x80 [ 606.301356] amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x287/0x4d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.301661] amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu] [ 606.302050] ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5 [ 606.302069] amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu] [ 606.302452] amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu] [ 606.302862] ? drm_sched_entity_error+0x82/0x190 [gpu_sched] [ 606.302890] amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu] [ 606.303366] drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched] [ 606.303388] process_one_work+0x21e/0x680 [ 606.303409] worker_thread+0x190/0x350 [ 606.303424] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 [ 606.303437] kthread+0xe7/0x120 [ 606.303449] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 606.303463] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [ 606.303476] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ 606.303489] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ 606.303512] </TASK> v2: Refactor lock handling to resolve circular dependency (Alex) - Introduced a `sched_work` flag to defer the call to `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` until after releasing `enforce_isolation_mutex`. - This change ensures that `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` is called outside the critical section, preventing the circular dependency and deadlock. - The `sched_work` flag is set within the mutex-protected section if conditions are met, and the actual function call is made afterward. - This approach ensures consistent lock acquisition order. Fixes: afefd6f ("drm/amdgpu: Implement Enforce Isolation Handler for KGD/KFD serialization") Cc: Christian König <[email protected]> Cc: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit 0b6b2dd) Cc: [email protected]
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 17, 2025
syzkaller reported such a BUG_ON(): ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at mm/khugepaged.c:1835! Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP ... CPU: 6 UID: 0 PID: 8009 Comm: syz.15.106 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 6.13.0-rc6 torvalds#22 Tainted: [W]=WARN Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 pstate: 00400005 (nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : collapse_file+0xa44/0x1400 lr : collapse_file+0x88/0x1400 sp : ffff80008afe3a60 ... Call trace: collapse_file+0xa44/0x1400 (P) hpage_collapse_scan_file+0x278/0x400 madvise_collapse+0x1bc/0x678 madvise_vma_behavior+0x32c/0x448 madvise_walk_vmas.constprop.0+0xbc/0x140 do_madvise.part.0+0xdc/0x2c8 __arm64_sys_madvise+0x68/0x88 invoke_syscall+0x50/0x120 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xc8/0xf0 do_el0_svc+0x24/0x38 el0_svc+0x34/0x128 el0t_64_sync_handler+0xc8/0xd0 el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x198 This indicates that the pgoff is unaligned. After analysis, I confirm the vma is mapped to /dev/zero. Such a vma certainly has vm_file, but it is set to anonymous by mmap_zero(). So even if it's mmapped by 2m-unaligned, it can pass the check in thp_vma_allowable_order() as it is an anonymous-mmap, but then be collapsed as a file-mmap. It seems the problem has existed for a long time, but actually, since we have khugepaged_max_ptes_none check before, we will skip collapse it as it is /dev/zero and so has no present page. But commit d8ea7cc limit the check for only khugepaged, so the BUG_ON() can be triggered by madvise_collapse(). Add vma_is_anonymous() check to make such vma be processed by hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Fixes: d8ea7cc ("mm/khugepaged: add flag to predicate khugepaged-only behavior") Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <[email protected]> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <[email protected]> Cc: Chengming Zhou <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: Kefeng Wang <[email protected]> Cc: Mattew Wilcox <[email protected]> Cc: Muchun Song <[email protected]> Cc: Nanyong Sun <[email protected]> Cc: Qi Zheng <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 17, 2025
syz reports an out of bounds read: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ocfs2_match fs/ocfs2/dir.c:334 [inline] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in ocfs2_search_dirblock+0x283/0x6e0 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:367 Read of size 1 at addr ffff88804d8b9982 by task syz-executor.2/14802 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 14802 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc4 #2 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 Sched_ext: serialise (enabled+all), task: runnable_at=-10ms Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x229/0x350 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:378 [inline] print_report+0x164/0x530 mm/kasan/report.c:489 kasan_report+0x147/0x180 mm/kasan/report.c:602 ocfs2_match fs/ocfs2/dir.c:334 [inline] ocfs2_search_dirblock+0x283/0x6e0 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:367 ocfs2_find_entry_id fs/ocfs2/dir.c:414 [inline] ocfs2_find_entry+0x1143/0x2db0 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:1078 ocfs2_find_files_on_disk+0x18e/0x530 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:1981 ocfs2_lookup_ino_from_name+0xb6/0x110 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:2003 ocfs2_lookup+0x30a/0xd40 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:122 lookup_open fs/namei.c:3627 [inline] open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3748 [inline] path_openat+0x145a/0x3870 fs/namei.c:3984 do_filp_open+0xe9/0x1c0 fs/namei.c:4014 do_sys_openat2+0x135/0x1d0 fs/open.c:1402 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1417 [inline] __do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1433 [inline] __se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1428 [inline] __x64_sys_openat+0x15d/0x1c0 fs/open.c:1428 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf6/0x210 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f01076903ad Code: c3 e8 a7 2b 00 00 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f01084acfc8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000101 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f01077cbf80 RCX: 00007f01076903ad RDX: 0000000000105042 RSI: 0000000020000080 RDI: ffffffffffffff9c RBP: 00007f01077cbf80 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 00000000000001ff R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007f01077cbf80 R14: 00007f010764fc90 R15: 00007f010848d000 </TASK> ================================================================== And a general protection fault in ocfs2_prepare_dir_for_insert: ================================================================== loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 32768 JBD2: Ignoring recovery information on journal ocfs2: Mounting device (7,0) on (node local, slot 0) with ordered data mode. Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000001: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000008-0x000000000000000f] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5096 Comm: syz-executor792 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4-syzkaller-00002-gb0da640826ba #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:ocfs2_find_dir_space_id fs/ocfs2/dir.c:3406 [inline] RIP: 0010:ocfs2_prepare_dir_for_insert+0x3309/0x5c70 fs/ocfs2/dir.c:4280 Code: 00 00 e8 2a 25 13 fe e9 ba 06 00 00 e8 20 25 13 fe e9 4f 01 00 00 e8 16 25 13 fe 49 8d 7f 08 49 8d 5f 09 48 89 f8 48 c1 e8 03 <42> 0f b6 04 20 84 c0 0f 85 bd 23 00 00 48 89 d8 48 c1 e8 03 42 0f RSP: 0018:ffffc9000af9f020 EFLAGS: 00010202 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000009 RCX: ffff88801e27a440 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000400 RDI: 0000000000000008 RBP: ffffc9000af9f830 R08: ffffffff8380395b R09: ffffffff838090a7 R10: 0000000000000002 R11: ffff88801e27a440 R12: dffffc0000000000 R13: ffff88803c660878 R14: f700000000000088 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 000055555a677380(0000) GS:ffff888020800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000560bce569178 CR3: 000000001de5a000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: <TASK> ocfs2_mknod+0xcaf/0x2b40 fs/ocfs2/namei.c:292 vfs_mknod+0x36d/0x3b0 fs/namei.c:4088 do_mknodat+0x3ec/0x5b0 __do_sys_mknodat fs/namei.c:4166 [inline] __se_sys_mknodat fs/namei.c:4163 [inline] __x64_sys_mknodat+0xa7/0xc0 fs/namei.c:4163 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f2dafda3a99 Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 f1 17 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007ffe336a6658 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000103 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f2dafda3a99 RDX: 00000000000021c0 RSI: 0000000020000040 RDI: 00000000ffffff9c RBP: 00007f2dafe1b5f0 R08: 0000000000004480 R09: 000055555a6784c0 R10: 0000000000000103 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffe336a6680 R13: 00007ffe336a68a8 R14: 431bde82d7b634db R15: 00007f2dafdec03b </TASK> ================================================================== The two reports are all caused invalid negative i_size of dir inode. For ocfs2, dir_inode can't be negative or zero. Here add a check in which is called by ocfs2_check_dir_for_entry(). It fixes the second report as ocfs2_check_dir_for_entry() must be called before ocfs2_prepare_dir_for_insert(). Also set a up limit for dir with OCFS2_INLINE_DATA_FL. The i_size can't be great than blocksize. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Reported-by: Jiacheng Xu <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/ocfs2-devel/[email protected]/T/#u Reported-by: [email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/T/ Signed-off-by: Su Yue <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Heming Zhao <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <[email protected]> Cc: Mark Fasheh <[email protected]> Cc: Joel Becker <[email protected]> Cc: Junxiao Bi <[email protected]> Cc: Changwei Ge <[email protected]> Cc: Jun Piao <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 18, 2025
irq_chip functions may be called in raw spinlock context. Therefore, we must also use a raw spinlock for our own internal locking. This fixes the following lockdep splat: [ 5.349336] ============================= [ 5.353349] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [ 5.357361] 6.13.0-rc5+ torvalds#69 Tainted: G W [ 5.363031] ----------------------------- [ 5.367045] kworker/u17:1/44 is trying to lock: [ 5.371587] ffffff88018b02c0 (&chip->gpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: xgpio_irq_unmask (drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c:433 (discriminator 8)) [ 5.380079] other info that might help us debug this: [ 5.385138] context-{5:5} [ 5.387762] 5 locks held by kworker/u17:1/44: [ 5.392123] #0: ffffff8800014958 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3204) [ 5.402260] #1: ffffffc082fcbdd8 (deferred_probe_work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3205) [ 5.411528] #2: ffffff880172c900 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_attach (drivers/base/dd.c:1006) [ 5.419929] #3: ffffff88039c8268 (request_class#2){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __setup_irq (kernel/irq/internals.h:156 kernel/irq/manage.c:1596) [ 5.428331] #4: ffffff88039c80c8 (lock_class#2){....}-{2:2}, at: __setup_irq (kernel/irq/manage.c:1614) [ 5.436472] stack backtrace: [ 5.439359] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 44 Comm: kworker/u17:1 Tainted: G W 6.13.0-rc5+ torvalds#69 [ 5.448690] Tainted: [W]=WARN [ 5.451656] Hardware name: xlnx,zynqmp (DT) [ 5.455845] Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func [ 5.461699] Call trace: [ 5.464147] show_stack+0x18/0x24 C [ 5.467821] dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123) [ 5.471501] dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:130) [ 5.474824] __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4828 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4898 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5176) [ 5.478758] lock_acquire (arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:467 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5851 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5814) [ 5.482429] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave (include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:111 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162) [ 5.486797] xgpio_irq_unmask (drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c:433 (discriminator 8)) [ 5.490737] irq_enable (kernel/irq/internals.h:236 kernel/irq/chip.c:170 kernel/irq/chip.c:439 kernel/irq/chip.c:432 kernel/irq/chip.c:345) [ 5.494060] __irq_startup (kernel/irq/internals.h:241 kernel/irq/chip.c:180 kernel/irq/chip.c:250) [ 5.497645] irq_startup (kernel/irq/chip.c:270) [ 5.501143] __setup_irq (kernel/irq/manage.c:1807) [ 5.504728] request_threaded_irq (kernel/irq/manage.c:2208) Fixes: a32c7ca ("gpio: gpio-xilinx: Add interrupt support") Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 21, 2025
Power Hypervisor can possibily allocate MMIO window intersecting with Dynamic DMA Window (DDW) range, which is over 32-bit addressing. These MMIO pages needs to be marked as reserved so that IOMMU doesn't map DMA buffers in this range. The current code is not marking these pages correctly which is resulting in LPAR to OOPS while booting. The stack is at below BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on read at 0xc00800005cd40000 Faulting instruction address: 0xc00000000005cdac Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1] LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Hash SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA pSeries Modules linked in: af_packet rfkill ibmveth(X) lpfc(+) nvmet_fc nvmet nvme_keyring crct10dif_vpmsum nvme_fc nvme_fabrics nvme_core be2net(+) nvme_auth rtc_generic nfsd auth_rpcgss nfs_acl lockd grace sunrpc fuse configfs ip_tables x_tables xfs libcrc32c dm_service_time ibmvfc(X) scsi_transport_fc vmx_crypto gf128mul crc32c_vpmsum dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_multipath dm_mod sd_mod scsi_dh_emc scsi_dh_rdac scsi_dh_alua t10_pi crc64_rocksoft_generic crc64_rocksoft sg crc64 scsi_mod Supported: Yes, External CPU: 8 PID: 241 Comm: kworker/8:1 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.4.0-150600.23.14-default #1 SLE15-SP6 b44ee71c81261b9e4bab5e0cde1f2ed891d5359b Hardware name: IBM,9080-M9S POWER9 (raw) 0x4e2103 0xf000005 of:IBM,FW950.B0 (VH950_149) hv:phyp pSeries Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn NIP: c00000000005cdac LR: c00000000005e830 CTR: 0000000000000000 REGS: c00001400c9ff770 TRAP: 0300 Not tainted (6.4.0-150600.23.14-default) MSR: 800000000280b033 <SF,VEC,VSX,EE,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 24228448 XER: 00000001 CFAR: c00000000005cdd4 DAR: c00800005cd40000 DSISR: 40000000 IRQMASK: 0 GPR00: c00000000005e830 c00001400c9ffa10 c000000001987d00 c00001400c4fe800 GPR04: 0000080000000000 0000000000000001 0000000004000000 0000000000800000 GPR08: 0000000004000000 0000000000000001 c00800005cd40000 ffffffffffffffff GPR12: 0000000084228882 c00000000a4c4f00 0000000000000010 0000080000000000 GPR16: c00001400c4fe800 0000000004000000 0800000000000000 c00000006088b800 GPR20: c00001401a7be980 c00001400eff3800 c000000002a2da68 000000000000002b GPR24: c0000000026793a8 c000000002679368 000000000000002a c0000000026793c8 GPR28: 000008007effffff 0000080000000000 0000000000800000 c00001400c4fe800 NIP [c00000000005cdac] iommu_table_reserve_pages+0xac/0x100 LR [c00000000005e830] iommu_init_table+0x80/0x1e0 Call Trace: [c00001400c9ffa10] [c00000000005e810] iommu_init_table+0x60/0x1e0 (unreliable) [c00001400c9ffa90] [c00000000010356c] iommu_bypass_supported_pSeriesLP+0x9cc/0xe40 [c00001400c9ffc30] [c00000000005c300] dma_iommu_dma_supported+0xf0/0x230 [c00001400c9ffcb0] [c00000000024b0c4] dma_supported+0x44/0x90 [c00001400c9ffcd0] [c00000000024b14c] dma_set_mask+0x3c/0x80 [c00001400c9ffd00] [c0080000555b715c] be_probe+0xc4/0xb90 [be2net] [c00001400c9ffdc0] [c000000000986f3c] local_pci_probe+0x6c/0x110 [c00001400c9ffe40] [c000000000188f28] work_for_cpu_fn+0x38/0x60 [c00001400c9ffe70] [c00000000018e454] process_one_work+0x314/0x620 [c00001400c9fff10] [c00000000018f280] worker_thread+0x2b0/0x620 [c00001400c9fff90] [c00000000019bb18] kthread+0x148/0x150 [c00001400c9fffe0] [c00000000000ded8] start_kernel_thread+0x14/0x18 There are 2 issues in the code 1. The index is "int" while the address is "unsigned long". This results in negative value when setting the bitmap. 2. The DMA offset is page shifted but the MMIO range is used as-is (64-bit address). MMIO address needs to be page shifted as well. Fixes: 3c33066 ("powerpc/kernel/iommu: Add new iommu_table_in_use() helper") Signed-off-by: Gaurav Batra <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Nilay Shroff <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <[email protected]> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2025
DC driver is using two different values to define the maximum number of surfaces: MAX_SURFACES and MAX_SURFACE_NUM. Consolidate MAX_SURFACES as the unique definition for surface updates across DC. It fixes page fault faced by Cosmic users on AMD display versions that support two overlay planes, since the introduction of cursor overlay mode. [Nov26 21:33] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000000051d0f08b [ +0.000015] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [ +0.000006] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page [ +0.000005] PGD 0 P4D 0 [ +0.000007] Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI [ +0.000006] CPU: 4 PID: 71 Comm: kworker/u32:6 Not tainted 6.10.0+ torvalds#300 [ +0.000006] Hardware name: Valve Jupiter/Jupiter, BIOS F7A0131 01/30/2024 [ +0.000007] Workqueue: events_unbound commit_work [drm_kms_helper] [ +0.000040] RIP: 0010:copy_stream_update_to_stream.isra.0+0x30d/0x750 [amdgpu] [ +0.000847] Code: 8b 10 49 89 94 24 f8 00 00 00 48 8b 50 08 49 89 94 24 00 01 00 00 8b 40 10 41 89 84 24 08 01 00 00 49 8b 45 78 48 85 c0 74 0b <0f> b6 00 41 88 84 24 90 64 00 00 49 8b 45 60 48 85 c0 74 3b 48 8b [ +0.000010] RSP: 0018:ffffc203802f79a0 EFLAGS: 00010206 [ +0.000009] RAX: 0000000051d0f08b RBX: 0000000000000004 RCX: ffff9f964f0a8070 [ +0.000004] RDX: ffff9f9710f90e40 RSI: ffff9f96600c8000 RDI: ffff9f964f000000 [ +0.000004] RBP: ffffc203802f79f8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 [ +0.000005] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff9f96600c8000 [ +0.000004] R13: ffff9f9710f90e40 R14: ffff9f964f000000 R15: ffff9f96600c8000 [ +0.000004] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9f9970000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ +0.000005] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ +0.000005] CR2: 0000000051d0f08b CR3: 00000002e6a20000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 [ +0.000005] Call Trace: [ +0.000011] <TASK> [ +0.000010] ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x27 [ +0.000012] ? page_fault_oops+0x15a/0x2d0 [ +0.000014] ? exc_page_fault+0x7e/0x180 [ +0.000009] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30 [ +0.000013] ? copy_stream_update_to_stream.isra.0+0x30d/0x750 [amdgpu] [ +0.000739] ? dc_commit_state_no_check+0xd6c/0xe70 [amdgpu] [ +0.000470] update_planes_and_stream_state+0x49b/0x4f0 [amdgpu] [ +0.000450] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000009] ? commit_minimal_transition_state+0x239/0x3d0 [amdgpu] [ +0.000446] update_planes_and_stream_v2+0x24a/0x590 [amdgpu] [ +0.000464] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000009] ? sort+0x31/0x50 [ +0.000007] ? amdgpu_dm_atomic_commit_tail+0x159f/0x3a30 [amdgpu] [ +0.000508] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000009] ? amdgpu_crtc_get_scanout_position+0x28/0x40 [amdgpu] [ +0.000377] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000009] ? drm_crtc_vblank_helper_get_vblank_timestamp_internal+0x160/0x390 [drm] [ +0.000058] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000005] ? dma_fence_default_wait+0x8c/0x260 [ +0.000010] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000005] ? wait_for_completion_timeout+0x13b/0x170 [ +0.000006] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000005] ? dma_fence_wait_timeout+0x108/0x140 [ +0.000010] ? commit_tail+0x94/0x130 [drm_kms_helper] [ +0.000024] ? process_one_work+0x177/0x330 [ +0.000008] ? worker_thread+0x266/0x3a0 [ +0.000006] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10 [ +0.000004] ? kthread+0xd2/0x100 [ +0.000006] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ +0.000006] ? ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ +0.000004] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 [ +0.000005] ? ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 [ +0.000011] </TASK> Fixes: 1b04dcc ("drm/amd/display: Introduce overlay cursor mode") Suggested-by: Leo Li <[email protected]> Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/3693 Signed-off-by: Melissa Wen <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2025
dm_get_plane_scale doesn't take into account plane scaled size equal to zero, leading to a kernel oops due to division by zero. Fix by setting out-scale size as zero when the dst size is zero, similar to what is done by drm_calc_scale(). This issue started with the introduction of cursor ovelay mode that uses this function to assess cursor mode changes via dm_crtc_get_cursor_mode() before checking plane state. [Dec17 17:14] Oops: divide error: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI [ +0.000018] CPU: 5 PID: 1660 Comm: surface-DP-1 Not tainted 6.10.0+ torvalds#231 [ +0.000007] Hardware name: Valve Jupiter/Jupiter, BIOS F7A0131 01/30/2024 [ +0.000004] RIP: 0010:dm_get_plane_scale+0x3f/0x60 [amdgpu] [ +0.000553] Code: 44 0f b7 41 3a 44 0f b7 49 3e 83 e0 0f 48 0f a3 c2 73 21 69 41 28 e8 03 00 00 31 d2 41 f7 f1 31 d2 89 06 69 41 2c e8 03 00 00 <41> f7 f0 89 07 e9 d7 d8 7e e9 44 89 c8 45 89 c1 41 89 c0 eb d4 66 [ +0.000005] RSP: 0018:ffffa8df0de6b8a0 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ +0.000006] RAX: 00000000000003e8 RBX: ffff9ac65c1f6e00 RCX: ffff9ac65d055500 [ +0.000003] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffa8df0de6b8b0 RDI: ffffa8df0de6b8b4 [ +0.000004] RBP: ffff9ac64e7a5800 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000a00 [ +0.000003] R10: 00000000000000ff R11: 0000000000000054 R12: ffff9ac6d0700010 [ +0.000003] R13: ffff9ac65d054f00 R14: ffff9ac65d055500 R15: ffff9ac64e7a60a0 [ +0.000004] FS: 00007f869ea00640(0000) GS:ffff9ac970080000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ +0.000004] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ +0.000003] CR2: 000055ca701becd0 CR3: 000000010e7f2000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0 [ +0.000004] Call Trace: [ +0.000007] <TASK> [ +0.000006] ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x27 [ +0.000009] ? die+0x2e/0x50 [ +0.000007] ? do_trap+0xca/0x110 [ +0.000007] ? do_error_trap+0x6a/0x90 [ +0.000006] ? dm_get_plane_scale+0x3f/0x60 [amdgpu] [ +0.000504] ? exc_divide_error+0x38/0x50 [ +0.000005] ? dm_get_plane_scale+0x3f/0x60 [amdgpu] [ +0.000488] ? asm_exc_divide_error+0x1a/0x20 [ +0.000011] ? dm_get_plane_scale+0x3f/0x60 [amdgpu] [ +0.000593] dm_crtc_get_cursor_mode+0x33f/0x430 [amdgpu] [ +0.000562] amdgpu_dm_atomic_check+0x2ef/0x1770 [amdgpu] [ +0.000501] drm_atomic_check_only+0x5e1/0xa30 [drm] [ +0.000047] drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x832/0xcb0 [drm] [ +0.000050] ? __pfx_drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [drm] [ +0.000047] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xb3/0x100 [drm] [ +0.000062] drm_ioctl+0x27a/0x4f0 [drm] [ +0.000049] ? __pfx_drm_mode_atomic_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [drm] [ +0.000055] amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0x4e/0x90 [amdgpu] [ +0.000360] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x97/0xd0 [ +0.000010] do_syscall_64+0x82/0x190 [ +0.000008] ? __pfx_drm_mode_createblob_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [drm] [ +0.000044] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000006] ? drm_ioctl_kernel+0xb3/0x100 [drm] [ +0.000040] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000005] ? __check_object_size+0x50/0x220 [ +0.000007] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000005] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000005] ? drm_ioctl+0x2a4/0x4f0 [drm] [ +0.000039] ? __pfx_drm_mode_createblob_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [drm] [ +0.000043] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000005] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000005] ? __pm_runtime_suspend+0x69/0xc0 [ +0.000006] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000005] ? amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0x71/0x90 [amdgpu] [ +0.000366] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000006] ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x77/0x210 [ +0.000007] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000005] ? do_syscall_64+0x8e/0x190 [ +0.000006] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000006] ? do_syscall_64+0x8e/0x190 [ +0.000006] ? srso_return_thunk+0x5/0x5f [ +0.000007] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e [ +0.000008] RIP: 0033:0x55bb7cd962bc [ +0.000007] Code: 4c 89 6c 24 18 4c 89 64 24 20 4c 89 74 24 28 0f 57 c0 0f 11 44 24 30 89 c7 48 8d 54 24 08 b8 10 00 00 00 be bc 64 38 c0 0f 05 <49> 89 c7 48 83 3b 00 74 09 4c 89 c7 ff 15 62 64 99 00 48 83 7b 18 [ +0.000005] RSP: 002b:00007f869e9f4da0 EFLAGS: 00000217 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [ +0.000007] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f869e9f4fb8 RCX: 000055bb7cd962bc [ +0.000004] RDX: 00007f869e9f4da8 RSI: 00000000c03864bc RDI: 000000000000003b [ +0.000003] RBP: 000055bb9ddcbcc0 R08: 00007f86541b9920 R09: 0000000000000009 [ +0.000004] R10: 0000000000000004 R11: 0000000000000217 R12: 00007f865406c6b0 [ +0.000003] R13: 00007f86541b5290 R14: 00007f865410b700 R15: 000055bb9ddcbc18 [ +0.000009] </TASK> Fixes: 1b04dcc ("drm/amd/display: Introduce overlay cursor mode") Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/3729 Reported-by: Fabio Scaccabarozzi <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Fabio Scaccabarozzi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Fabio Scaccabarozzi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Melissa Wen <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2025
If GuC fails to load, the driver wedges, but in the process it tries to do stuff that may not be initialized yet. This moves the xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_init() to be done earlier: as its own doc says, it's a software-only initialization and should had been named with the _early() suffix. Move it to be called by xe_gt_init_early(), so the locks and seqno are initialized, avoiding a NULL ptr deref when wedging: xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* GT0: load failed: status: Reset = 0, BootROM = 0x50, UKernel = 0x00, MIA = 0x00, Auth = 0x01 xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* GT0: firmware signature verification failed xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* CRITICAL: Xe has declared device 0000:03:00.0 as wedged. ... BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 9 UID: 0 PID: 3908 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G U W 6.13.0-rc4-xe+ #3 Tainted: [U]=USER, [W]=WARN Hardware name: Intel Corporation Alder Lake Client Platform/AlderLake-S ADP-S DDR5 UDIMM CRB, BIOS ADLSFWI1.R00.3275.A00.2207010640 07/01/2022 RIP: 0010:xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_reset+0x75/0x110 [xe] This can be easily triggered by poking the GuC binary to force a signature failure. There will still be an extra message, xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* GT0: GuC mmio request 0x4100: no reply 0x4100 but that's better than a NULL ptr deref. Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/3956 Fixes: 7dbe8af ("drm/xe: Wedge the entire device") Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2025
When COWing a relocation tree path, at relocation.c:replace_path(), we can trigger a lockdep splat while we are in the btrfs_search_slot() call against the relocation root. This happens in that callchain at ctree.c:read_block_for_search() when we happen to find a child extent buffer already loaded through the fs tree with a lockdep class set to the fs tree. So when we attempt to lock that extent buffer through a relocation tree we have to reset the lockdep class to the class for a relocation tree, since a relocation tree has extent buffers that used to belong to a fs tree and may currently be already loaded (we swap extent buffers between the two trees at the end of replace_path()). However we are missing calls to btrfs_maybe_reset_lockdep_class() to reset the lockdep class at ctree.c:read_block_for_search() before we read lock an extent buffer, just like we did for btrfs_search_slot() in commit b40130b ("btrfs: fix lockdep splat with reloc root extent buffers"). So add the missing btrfs_maybe_reset_lockdep_class() calls before the attempts to read lock an extent buffer at ctree.c:read_block_for_search(). The lockdep splat was reported by syzbot and it looks like this: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.13.0-rc5-syzkaller-00163-gab75170520d4 #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz.0.0/5335 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880545dbc38 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146 but task is already holding lock: ffff8880545dba58 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}: reacquire_held_locks+0x3eb/0x690 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5374 __lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5563 [inline] lock_release+0x396/0xa30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5870 up_write+0x79/0x590 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1629 btrfs_force_cow_block+0x14b3/0x1fd0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:660 btrfs_cow_block+0x371/0x830 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:755 btrfs_search_slot+0xc01/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2153 replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224 merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692 merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942 relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494 __btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278 btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #1 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{4:4}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 down_write_nested+0xa2/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1693 btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189 btrfs_init_new_buffer fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5052 [inline] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x41c/0x1440 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5132 btrfs_force_cow_block+0x526/0x1fd0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:573 btrfs_cow_block+0x371/0x830 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:755 btrfs_search_slot+0xc01/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2153 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x9c/0x1a0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:4351 btrfs_insert_empty_item fs/btrfs/ctree.h:688 [inline] btrfs_insert_inode_ref+0x2bb/0xf80 fs/btrfs/inode-item.c:330 btrfs_rename_exchange fs/btrfs/inode.c:7990 [inline] btrfs_rename2+0xcb7/0x2b90 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8374 vfs_rename+0xbdb/0xf00 fs/namei.c:5067 do_renameat2+0xd94/0x13f0 fs/namei.c:5224 __do_sys_renameat2 fs/namei.c:5258 [inline] __se_sys_renameat2 fs/namei.c:5255 [inline] __x64_sys_renameat2+0xce/0xe0 fs/namei.c:5255 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #0 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{4:4}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline] validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904 __lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 down_read_nested+0xb5/0xa50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1649 btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146 btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.h:188 [inline] read_block_for_search+0x718/0xbb0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1610 btrfs_search_slot+0x1274/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2237 replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224 merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692 merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942 relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494 __btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278 btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: btrfs-tree-01 --> btrfs-tree-01/1 --> btrfs-treloc-02/1 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-treloc-02/1); lock(btrfs-tree-01/1); lock(btrfs-treloc-02/1); rlock(btrfs-tree-01); *** DEADLOCK *** 8 locks held by syz.0.0/5335: #0: ffff88801e3ae420 (sb_writers#13){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x5e/0x200 fs/namespace.c:559 #1: ffff888052c760d0 (&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __btrfs_balance+0x4c2/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4183 #2: ffff888052c74850 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x775/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4086 #3: ffff88801e3ae610 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: merge_reloc_root+0xf11/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1659 #4: ffff888052c76470 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x405/0xda0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:288 #5: ffff888052c76498 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x405/0xda0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:288 #6: ffff8880545db878 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189 #7: ffff8880545dba58 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5335 Comm: syz.0.0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc5-syzkaller-00163-gab75170520d4 #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_circular_bug+0x13a/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2074 check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2206 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline] validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904 __lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 down_read_nested+0xb5/0xa50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1649 btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146 btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.h:188 [inline] read_block_for_search+0x718/0xbb0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1610 btrfs_search_slot+0x1274/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2237 replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224 merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692 merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942 relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494 __btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278 btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f1ac6985d29 Code: ff ff c3 (...) RSP: 002b:00007f1ac63fe038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f1ac6b76160 RCX: 00007f1ac6985d29 RDX: 0000000020000180 RSI: 00000000c4009420 RDI: 0000000000000007 RBP: 00007f1ac6a01b08 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 00007f1ac6b76160 R15: 00007fffda145a88 </TASK> Reported-by: [email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/[email protected]/ Fixes: 9978599 ("btrfs: reduce lock contention when eb cache miss for btree search") Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2025
…saction abort
If while we are doing a direct IO write a transaction abort happens, we
mark all existing ordered extents with the BTRFS_ORDERED_IOERR flag (done
at btrfs_destroy_ordered_extents()), and then after that if we enter
btrfs_split_ordered_extent() and the ordered extent has bytes left
(meaning we have a bio that doesn't cover the whole ordered extent, see
details at btrfs_extract_ordered_extent()), we will fail on the following
assertion at btrfs_split_ordered_extent():
ASSERT(!(flags & ~BTRFS_ORDERED_TYPE_FLAGS));
because the BTRFS_ORDERED_IOERR flag is set and the definition of
BTRFS_ORDERED_TYPE_FLAGS is just the union of all flags that identify the
type of write (regular, nocow, prealloc, compressed, direct IO, encoded).
Fix this by returning an error from btrfs_extract_ordered_extent() if we
find the BTRFS_ORDERED_IOERR flag in the ordered extent. The error will
be the error that resulted in the transaction abort or -EIO if no
transaction abort happened.
This was recently reported by syzbot with the following trace:
FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure.
name failslab, interval 1, probability 0, space 0, times 1
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5321 Comm: syz.0.0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc5-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
fail_dump lib/fault-inject.c:53 [inline]
should_fail_ex+0x3b0/0x4e0 lib/fault-inject.c:154
should_failslab+0xac/0x100 mm/failslab.c:46
slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:4072 [inline]
slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:4148 [inline]
__do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4297 [inline]
__kmalloc_noprof+0xdd/0x4c0 mm/slub.c:4310
kmalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:905 [inline]
kzalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:1037 [inline]
btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0x244/0x1100 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5742
reserve_chunk_space+0x1ca/0x2c0 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:4292
check_system_chunk fs/btrfs/block-group.c:4319 [inline]
do_chunk_alloc fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3891 [inline]
btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x77b/0xf80 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:4187
find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4166 [inline]
find_free_extent+0x42d1/0x5810 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4579
btrfs_reserve_extent+0x422/0x810 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4672
btrfs_new_extent_direct fs/btrfs/direct-io.c:186 [inline]
btrfs_get_blocks_direct_write+0x706/0xfa0 fs/btrfs/direct-io.c:321
btrfs_dio_iomap_begin+0xbb7/0x1180 fs/btrfs/direct-io.c:525
iomap_iter+0x697/0xf60 fs/iomap/iter.c:90
__iomap_dio_rw+0xeb9/0x25b0 fs/iomap/direct-io.c:702
btrfs_dio_write fs/btrfs/direct-io.c:775 [inline]
btrfs_direct_write+0x610/0xa30 fs/btrfs/direct-io.c:880
btrfs_do_write_iter+0x2a0/0x760 fs/btrfs/file.c:1397
do_iter_readv_writev+0x600/0x880
vfs_writev+0x376/0xba0 fs/read_write.c:1050
do_pwritev fs/read_write.c:1146 [inline]
__do_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1204 [inline]
__se_sys_pwritev2+0x196/0x2b0 fs/read_write.c:1195
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f1281f85d29
RSP: 002b:00007f12819fe038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000148
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f1282176080 RCX: 00007f1281f85d29
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000240 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: 00007f12819fe090 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000003
R10: 0000000000007000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000002
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f1282176080 R15: 00007ffcb9e23328
</TASK>
BTRFS error (device loop0 state A): Transaction aborted (error -12)
BTRFS: error (device loop0 state A) in btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item:5745: errno=-12 Out of memory
BTRFS info (device loop0 state EA): forced readonly
assertion failed: !(flags & ~BTRFS_ORDERED_TYPE_FLAGS), in fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c:1234
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c:1234!
Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5321 Comm: syz.0.0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc5-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:btrfs_split_ordered_extent+0xd8d/0xe20 fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c:1234
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000d1df2b8 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000057 RBX: 000000000006a000 RCX: 9ce21886c4195300
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000080000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: 0000000000000091 R08: ffffffff817f0a3c R09: 1ffff92001a3bdf4
R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff52001a3bdf5 R12: 1ffff1100a45f401
R13: ffff8880522fa018 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 000000000006a000
FS: 00007f12819fe6c0(0000) GS:ffff88801fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000557750bd7da8 CR3: 00000000400ea000 CR4: 0000000000352ef0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
<TASK>
btrfs_extract_ordered_extent fs/btrfs/direct-io.c:702 [inline]
btrfs_dio_submit_io+0x4be/0x6d0 fs/btrfs/direct-io.c:737
iomap_dio_submit_bio fs/iomap/direct-io.c:85 [inline]
iomap_dio_bio_iter+0x1022/0x1740 fs/iomap/direct-io.c:447
__iomap_dio_rw+0x13b7/0x25b0 fs/iomap/direct-io.c:703
btrfs_dio_write fs/btrfs/direct-io.c:775 [inline]
btrfs_direct_write+0x610/0xa30 fs/btrfs/direct-io.c:880
btrfs_do_write_iter+0x2a0/0x760 fs/btrfs/file.c:1397
do_iter_readv_writev+0x600/0x880
vfs_writev+0x376/0xba0 fs/read_write.c:1050
do_pwritev fs/read_write.c:1146 [inline]
__do_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1204 [inline]
__se_sys_pwritev2+0x196/0x2b0 fs/read_write.c:1195
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f1281f85d29
RSP: 002b:00007f12819fe038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000148
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f1282176080 RCX: 00007f1281f85d29
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000240 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: 00007f12819fe090 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000003
R10: 0000000000007000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000002
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f1282176080 R15: 00007ffcb9e23328
</TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
RIP: 0010:btrfs_split_ordered_extent+0xd8d/0xe20 fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c:1234
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000d1df2b8 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000057 RBX: 000000000006a000 RCX: 9ce21886c4195300
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000080000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: 0000000000000091 R08: ffffffff817f0a3c R09: 1ffff92001a3bdf4
R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff52001a3bdf5 R12: 1ffff1100a45f401
R13: ffff8880522fa018 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 000000000006a000
FS: 00007f12819fe6c0(0000) GS:ffff88801fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000557750bd7da8 CR3: 00000000400ea000 CR4: 0000000000352ef0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
In this case the transaction abort was due to (an injected) memory
allocation failure when attempting to allocate a new chunk.
Reported-by: [email protected]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/[email protected]/
Fixes: 52b1fdc ("btrfs: handle completed ordered extents in btrfs_split_ordered_extent")
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2025
When COWing a relocation tree path, at relocation.c:replace_path(), we can trigger a lockdep splat while we are in the btrfs_search_slot() call against the relocation root. This happens in that callchain at ctree.c:read_block_for_search() when we happen to find a child extent buffer already loaded through the fs tree with a lockdep class set to the fs tree. So when we attempt to lock that extent buffer through a relocation tree we have to reset the lockdep class to the class for a relocation tree, since a relocation tree has extent buffers that used to belong to a fs tree and may currently be already loaded (we swap extent buffers between the two trees at the end of replace_path()). However we are missing calls to btrfs_maybe_reset_lockdep_class() to reset the lockdep class at ctree.c:read_block_for_search() before we read lock an extent buffer, just like we did for btrfs_search_slot() in commit b40130b ("btrfs: fix lockdep splat with reloc root extent buffers"). So add the missing btrfs_maybe_reset_lockdep_class() calls before the attempts to read lock an extent buffer at ctree.c:read_block_for_search(). The lockdep splat was reported by syzbot and it looks like this: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.13.0-rc5-syzkaller-00163-gab75170520d4 #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz.0.0/5335 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880545dbc38 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146 but task is already holding lock: ffff8880545dba58 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}: reacquire_held_locks+0x3eb/0x690 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5374 __lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5563 [inline] lock_release+0x396/0xa30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5870 up_write+0x79/0x590 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1629 btrfs_force_cow_block+0x14b3/0x1fd0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:660 btrfs_cow_block+0x371/0x830 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:755 btrfs_search_slot+0xc01/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2153 replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224 merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692 merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942 relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494 __btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278 btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #1 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{4:4}: lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 down_write_nested+0xa2/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1693 btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189 btrfs_init_new_buffer fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5052 [inline] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x41c/0x1440 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5132 btrfs_force_cow_block+0x526/0x1fd0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:573 btrfs_cow_block+0x371/0x830 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:755 btrfs_search_slot+0xc01/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2153 btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x9c/0x1a0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:4351 btrfs_insert_empty_item fs/btrfs/ctree.h:688 [inline] btrfs_insert_inode_ref+0x2bb/0xf80 fs/btrfs/inode-item.c:330 btrfs_rename_exchange fs/btrfs/inode.c:7990 [inline] btrfs_rename2+0xcb7/0x2b90 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8374 vfs_rename+0xbdb/0xf00 fs/namei.c:5067 do_renameat2+0xd94/0x13f0 fs/namei.c:5224 __do_sys_renameat2 fs/namei.c:5258 [inline] __se_sys_renameat2 fs/namei.c:5255 [inline] __x64_sys_renameat2+0xce/0xe0 fs/namei.c:5255 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #0 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{4:4}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline] validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904 __lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 down_read_nested+0xb5/0xa50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1649 btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146 btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.h:188 [inline] read_block_for_search+0x718/0xbb0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1610 btrfs_search_slot+0x1274/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2237 replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224 merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692 merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942 relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494 __btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278 btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: btrfs-tree-01 --> btrfs-tree-01/1 --> btrfs-treloc-02/1 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(btrfs-treloc-02/1); lock(btrfs-tree-01/1); lock(btrfs-treloc-02/1); rlock(btrfs-tree-01); *** DEADLOCK *** 8 locks held by syz.0.0/5335: #0: ffff88801e3ae420 (sb_writers#13){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x5e/0x200 fs/namespace.c:559 #1: ffff888052c760d0 (&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __btrfs_balance+0x4c2/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4183 #2: ffff888052c74850 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x775/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4086 #3: ffff88801e3ae610 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: merge_reloc_root+0xf11/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1659 #4: ffff888052c76470 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x405/0xda0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:288 #5: ffff888052c76498 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x405/0xda0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:288 #6: ffff8880545db878 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189 #7: ffff8880545dba58 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5335 Comm: syz.0.0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc5-syzkaller-00163-gab75170520d4 #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_circular_bug+0x13a/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2074 check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2206 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline] validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904 __lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226 lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849 down_read_nested+0xb5/0xa50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1649 btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146 btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.h:188 [inline] read_block_for_search+0x718/0xbb0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1610 btrfs_search_slot+0x1274/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2237 replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224 merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692 merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942 relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494 __btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278 btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f1ac6985d29 Code: ff ff c3 (...) RSP: 002b:00007f1ac63fe038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f1ac6b76160 RCX: 00007f1ac6985d29 RDX: 0000000020000180 RSI: 00000000c4009420 RDI: 0000000000000007 RBP: 00007f1ac6a01b08 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 00007f1ac6b76160 R15: 00007fffda145a88 </TASK> Reported-by: [email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/[email protected]/ Fixes: 9978599 ("btrfs: reduce lock contention when eb cache miss for btree search") Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
kdave
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 23, 2025
…saction abort
If while we are doing a direct IO write a transaction abort happens, we
mark all existing ordered extents with the BTRFS_ORDERED_IOERR flag (done
at btrfs_destroy_ordered_extents()), and then after that if we enter
btrfs_split_ordered_extent() and the ordered extent has bytes left
(meaning we have a bio that doesn't cover the whole ordered extent, see
details at btrfs_extract_ordered_extent()), we will fail on the following
assertion at btrfs_split_ordered_extent():
ASSERT(!(flags & ~BTRFS_ORDERED_TYPE_FLAGS));
because the BTRFS_ORDERED_IOERR flag is set and the definition of
BTRFS_ORDERED_TYPE_FLAGS is just the union of all flags that identify the
type of write (regular, nocow, prealloc, compressed, direct IO, encoded).
Fix this by returning an error from btrfs_extract_ordered_extent() if we
find the BTRFS_ORDERED_IOERR flag in the ordered extent. The error will
be the error that resulted in the transaction abort or -EIO if no
transaction abort happened.
This was recently reported by syzbot with the following trace:
FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure.
name failslab, interval 1, probability 0, space 0, times 1
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5321 Comm: syz.0.0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc5-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
fail_dump lib/fault-inject.c:53 [inline]
should_fail_ex+0x3b0/0x4e0 lib/fault-inject.c:154
should_failslab+0xac/0x100 mm/failslab.c:46
slab_pre_alloc_hook mm/slub.c:4072 [inline]
slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:4148 [inline]
__do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:4297 [inline]
__kmalloc_noprof+0xdd/0x4c0 mm/slub.c:4310
kmalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:905 [inline]
kzalloc_noprof include/linux/slab.h:1037 [inline]
btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0x244/0x1100 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5742
reserve_chunk_space+0x1ca/0x2c0 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:4292
check_system_chunk fs/btrfs/block-group.c:4319 [inline]
do_chunk_alloc fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3891 [inline]
btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x77b/0xf80 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:4187
find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4166 [inline]
find_free_extent+0x42d1/0x5810 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4579
btrfs_reserve_extent+0x422/0x810 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4672
btrfs_new_extent_direct fs/btrfs/direct-io.c:186 [inline]
btrfs_get_blocks_direct_write+0x706/0xfa0 fs/btrfs/direct-io.c:321
btrfs_dio_iomap_begin+0xbb7/0x1180 fs/btrfs/direct-io.c:525
iomap_iter+0x697/0xf60 fs/iomap/iter.c:90
__iomap_dio_rw+0xeb9/0x25b0 fs/iomap/direct-io.c:702
btrfs_dio_write fs/btrfs/direct-io.c:775 [inline]
btrfs_direct_write+0x610/0xa30 fs/btrfs/direct-io.c:880
btrfs_do_write_iter+0x2a0/0x760 fs/btrfs/file.c:1397
do_iter_readv_writev+0x600/0x880
vfs_writev+0x376/0xba0 fs/read_write.c:1050
do_pwritev fs/read_write.c:1146 [inline]
__do_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1204 [inline]
__se_sys_pwritev2+0x196/0x2b0 fs/read_write.c:1195
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f1281f85d29
RSP: 002b:00007f12819fe038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000148
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f1282176080 RCX: 00007f1281f85d29
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000240 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: 00007f12819fe090 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000003
R10: 0000000000007000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000002
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f1282176080 R15: 00007ffcb9e23328
</TASK>
BTRFS error (device loop0 state A): Transaction aborted (error -12)
BTRFS: error (device loop0 state A) in btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item:5745: errno=-12 Out of memory
BTRFS info (device loop0 state EA): forced readonly
assertion failed: !(flags & ~BTRFS_ORDERED_TYPE_FLAGS), in fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c:1234
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c:1234!
Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5321 Comm: syz.0.0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc5-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:btrfs_split_ordered_extent+0xd8d/0xe20 fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c:1234
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000d1df2b8 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000057 RBX: 000000000006a000 RCX: 9ce21886c4195300
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000080000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: 0000000000000091 R08: ffffffff817f0a3c R09: 1ffff92001a3bdf4
R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff52001a3bdf5 R12: 1ffff1100a45f401
R13: ffff8880522fa018 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 000000000006a000
FS: 00007f12819fe6c0(0000) GS:ffff88801fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000557750bd7da8 CR3: 00000000400ea000 CR4: 0000000000352ef0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
<TASK>
btrfs_extract_ordered_extent fs/btrfs/direct-io.c:702 [inline]
btrfs_dio_submit_io+0x4be/0x6d0 fs/btrfs/direct-io.c:737
iomap_dio_submit_bio fs/iomap/direct-io.c:85 [inline]
iomap_dio_bio_iter+0x1022/0x1740 fs/iomap/direct-io.c:447
__iomap_dio_rw+0x13b7/0x25b0 fs/iomap/direct-io.c:703
btrfs_dio_write fs/btrfs/direct-io.c:775 [inline]
btrfs_direct_write+0x610/0xa30 fs/btrfs/direct-io.c:880
btrfs_do_write_iter+0x2a0/0x760 fs/btrfs/file.c:1397
do_iter_readv_writev+0x600/0x880
vfs_writev+0x376/0xba0 fs/read_write.c:1050
do_pwritev fs/read_write.c:1146 [inline]
__do_sys_pwritev2 fs/read_write.c:1204 [inline]
__se_sys_pwritev2+0x196/0x2b0 fs/read_write.c:1195
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
RIP: 0033:0x7f1281f85d29
RSP: 002b:00007f12819fe038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000148
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f1282176080 RCX: 00007f1281f85d29
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000020000240 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: 00007f12819fe090 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000003
R10: 0000000000007000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000002
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007f1282176080 R15: 00007ffcb9e23328
</TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
RIP: 0010:btrfs_split_ordered_extent+0xd8d/0xe20 fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c:1234
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000d1df2b8 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000057 RBX: 000000000006a000 RCX: 9ce21886c4195300
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000080000000 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: 0000000000000091 R08: ffffffff817f0a3c R09: 1ffff92001a3bdf4
R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff52001a3bdf5 R12: 1ffff1100a45f401
R13: ffff8880522fa018 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 000000000006a000
FS: 00007f12819fe6c0(0000) GS:ffff88801fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000557750bd7da8 CR3: 00000000400ea000 CR4: 0000000000352ef0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
In this case the transaction abort was due to (an injected) memory
allocation failure when attempting to allocate a new chunk.
Reported-by: [email protected]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/[email protected]/
Fixes: 52b1fdc ("btrfs: handle completed ordered extents in btrfs_split_ordered_extent")
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Kindly consider to pull in these changes. These patch were individually submitted to the mailing list before. Thanks.