Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add schedule command #258

Conversation

hjuntan
Copy link

@hjuntan hjuntan commented Apr 4, 2024

No description provided.

Ragnapop and others added 30 commits March 7, 2024 20:47
Group images, CI status are updated to the correct format.
Project scope is updated to fit the tp project.
FindCommand now requires up to 5 predicates
to be matched. Added the skeleton of these and
edit FindCommand to include these predicates

Let's add correct logic to the test function
of these skeletons.
Add required Predicates for FindCommand
Tags are now represented as groups, tutorial groups
A person can be assigned for multilple groups.
Tags are the following value: Student, TA, Professor, None.
Tags are case-sensitive. (Top be improved on)
Able to easily distinguish between the people in the address book.

Addresses are removed as we deemed it as unnecessary information
for our target user.
Each person has an NUSID field which is uniquely identifies the person.
Add simple description to each Predicate.
Describe what each tests for.
Rikko1204 and others added 28 commits April 1, 2024 17:47
Allow group command to take multiple groups
Add test cases for ScheduleParser
Add more date formats for schedule
Add PinSequenceDiagram and Edit UG
Add more features to DG
Add nusId prefix to Edit Command
Resolve merge conflict in DeleteCommandParser
Change edit command to include nusId prefix
Branch UI change
Add testcases for ScheduleCommandParser and compulsory remark field
@hjuntan hjuntan closed this Apr 4, 2024
kaiyi27 added a commit to kaiyi27/tp that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants