Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(linter): use iter for collecting jest nodes #6719

Merged

Conversation

camchenry
Copy link
Contributor

@camchenry camchenry commented Oct 20, 2024

Adds a new method for iterating over jest nodes instead of collecting them all at once. The jest node collection now uses the iterator internally for consistency between the two approaches. This should save time and memory anywhere we need to iterate over Jest nodes, as we don't need to collect everything at once.

Copy link

graphite-app bot commented Oct 20, 2024

Your org has enabled the Graphite merge queue for merging into main

Add the label “0-merge” to the PR and Graphite will automatically add it to the merge queue when it’s ready to merge. Or use the label “hotfix” to add to the merge queue as a hot fix.

You must have a Graphite account and log in to Graphite in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Oct 20, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #6719 will not alter performance

Comparing 10-20-refactor_linter_use_iter_for_collecting_jest_nodes (ad8f281) with main (bad8770)

Summary

✅ 30 untouched benchmarks

@camchenry camchenry force-pushed the 10-20-refactor_linter_use_iterator_for_collecting_jest_imports branch from f040d3a to 5af35a5 Compare October 20, 2024 22:10
@camchenry camchenry force-pushed the 10-20-refactor_linter_use_iter_for_collecting_jest_nodes branch from a53df13 to 5f62629 Compare October 20, 2024 22:11
@DonIsaac DonIsaac force-pushed the 10-20-refactor_linter_use_iterator_for_collecting_jest_imports branch from 5af35a5 to dc19a8f Compare October 21, 2024 01:13
Base automatically changed from 10-20-refactor_linter_use_iterator_for_collecting_jest_imports to main October 21, 2024 01:17
@DonIsaac DonIsaac force-pushed the 10-20-refactor_linter_use_iter_for_collecting_jest_nodes branch from 5f62629 to e148ab3 Compare October 21, 2024 01:17
@camchenry
Copy link
Contributor Author

Not sure why CodSpeed is showing new benchmarks, but this shouldn't change anything about that.

@camchenry camchenry added the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Oct 21, 2024
Copy link
Contributor Author

camchenry commented Oct 21, 2024

Merge activity

  • Oct 20, 9:24 PM EDT: The merge label '0-merge' was detected. This PR will be added to the Graphite merge queue once it meets the requirements.
  • Oct 20, 9:25 PM EDT: A user added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
  • Oct 20, 9:25 PM EDT: The Graphite merge queue couldn't merge this PR because it failed for an unknown reason.
  • Oct 20, 10:05 PM EDT: A user added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
  • Oct 20, 10:19 PM EDT: A user merged this pull request with the Graphite merge queue.

@graphite-app graphite-app bot removed the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Oct 21, 2024
@Boshen Boshen added the 0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue label Oct 21, 2024 — with Graphite App
Adds a new method for iterating over jest nodes instead of collecting them all at once. The jest node collection now uses the iterator internally for consistency between the two approaches. This should save time and memory anywhere we need to iterate over Jest nodes, as we don't need to collect everything at once.
@Boshen Boshen force-pushed the 10-20-refactor_linter_use_iter_for_collecting_jest_nodes branch from e148ab3 to ad8f281 Compare October 21, 2024 02:14
@graphite-app graphite-app bot merged commit ad8f281 into main Oct 21, 2024
26 checks passed
@graphite-app graphite-app bot deleted the 10-20-refactor_linter_use_iter_for_collecting_jest_nodes branch October 21, 2024 02:19
Boshen added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2024
## [0.10.1] - 2024-10-21

### Features

- af25752 linter: Add `unicorn/prefer-math-min-max` (#6621) (Brian Liu)
- 5095f02 linter: Added fixer for duplicate prefix in valid title jest
rule (#6699) (Tapan Prakash)
- e9976d4 linter: Add title whitespace fixer for jest valid title rule
(#6669) (Tapan Prakash)
- 45f02d5 linter: Add `unicorn/consistent-empty-array-spread` (#6695)
(Brian Liu)
- 01a35bb linter/eslint: Show ignore patterns in `eslint/no-unused-vars`
diagnostic messages (#6696) (DonIsaac)

### Bug Fixes

- 1bcd707 editor: Update config sent to language server (#6724)
(Nicholas Rayburn)
- ce25c45 linter: Panic in `disable-directives` (#6677) (dalaoshu)
- a5de230 linter/import: `import/no-duplicates` handles namespace
imports correctly (#6694) (DonIsaac)
- b0b6ac7 linter/no-cond-assign: False positive when assignment is in
body statement (#6665) (camchenry)

### Performance

- 6a76ea8 linter/no-unused-vars: Use default IgnorePattern when /^_/ is
provided as a pattern (#6697) (DonIsaac)

### Refactor

- d6609e9 linter: Use `run_on_jest_node` for existing lint rules (#6722)
(camchenry)
- 97195ec linter: Add `run_on_jest_node` to run rules on only jest nodes
(#6721) (camchenry)
- 155fe7e linter: Allow `Semantic` to be passed for collecting Jest
nodes (#6720) (camchenry)
- ad8f281 linter: Use iter for collecting jest nodes (#6719) (camchenry)
- dc19a8f linter: Use iterator for collecting jest imports (#6718)
(camchenry)
- 29c1447 linter: `jest/valid-title` fixer to use `Span::shrink` method
(#6703) (Tapan Prakash)
- 2eb984a linter: Add missing `should_run` implementations (#6666)
(camchenry)
- 23f88b3 linter/import: Better diagnostic messages for
`import/no-duplicates` (#6693) (DonIsaac)

---------

Co-authored-by: Boshen <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: autofix-ci[bot] <114827586+autofix-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
0-merge Merge with Graphite Merge Queue A-linter Area - Linter C-cleanup Category - technical debt or refactoring. Solution not expected to change behavior
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants