[Feature request] Add option to write all candidates in the summaries #50
Labels
fixed v5.4
indicates that a bug or feature request has been fixed in v5.4
Comments
mfleisch
added
the
fixed v5.4
|
I had a discussion with @lfnothias on this. Since the information is already available in the compound level summaries we agreed that it might be enough if these files can be written to a location outside of the project-space so that they can be easily processed (without the huge raw results). This feature will be available in SIRIUS 5. Please reopen the issue if this does not tackle the problem. |
|
@mfleisch Thank you very much! Do you have an estimate of when it will be (pre-)released? |
|
Looks like I need to subscribe to the web service to get the new features ;P |
|
Yes an account is needed, but you will not have to subscribe when using an email address from your (academic/non-profit) institution ;-) Documentation will follow ;-) |
mfleisch
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 2, 2024
… into 'master' Resolve "new persistence model classes need more annotations" Closes #50 See merge request bright-giant/sirius/sirius-libs!23
mfleisch
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 2, 2024
…mono-repo' into 'master' Resolve "Merge sirius-libs into sirius-frontend to create a mono repo." Closes #300, #132, #126, #123, #128, #125, #127, #124, #122, #121, #120, #109, #115, #106, #99, #112, #111, #61, #110, #103, #108, #107, #104, #221, #102, #98, #198, #92, #94, #93, #85, #84, #87, #76, #56, #73, #32, #70, #65, #43, #63, #33, #53, #58, #59, #57, #54, #52, #41, #47, #50, #49, #48, #39, #46, #37, #38, #27, #34, #22, #31, #28, #18, #23, #21, #19, #9, #240, #280, #254, #242, #246, #238, #156, #25, #155, #189, #172, #154, #11, #6, #16, and #4 See merge request bright-giant/sirius/sirius-frontend!106
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi again,
Would be nice to have such an option directly for downstream uses of the candidates' list.
I think many people out there have custom bash scripts to cat their own summaries from the folders just because the "default" candidates are too restricted.
Best,
Edit: Having the ability to filter the N top candidates according to a given score, for example, the confidence score, would be even better! 😄
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: