Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix to check for missing obs in SaveObsDiag #299

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 16, 2024
Merged

Conversation

asewnath
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Adds check_obs function to SaveObsDiag to make sure code downstream isn't trying to execute if obs is missing. Also removed some logic added earlier in eva_observations.py because the check_obs function takes care of it now.

Added sst_ostia back to geos-ocean hofx swell run and everything seems to be working as expected

Closes #295
(Thanks for finding this bug @Dooruk!)

@asewnath asewnath requested a review from Dooruk February 16, 2024 17:06
Copy link
Collaborator

@Dooruk Dooruk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me, thanks @asewnath. Can I merge #297 first so you just need to pull those changes?

@Dooruk Dooruk merged commit 2bf2a70 into develop Feb 16, 2024
9 checks passed
@Dooruk Dooruk deleted the bugfix/missing_obs branch February 16, 2024 19:35
danholdaway added a commit to danholdaway/swell that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2024
* develop:
  Resolve pandas warnings (GEOS-ESM#322)
  Add atmospheric 3DVar case (GEOS-ESM#302)
  Update to Skylab7 Modules - Part 1 (SLES12) (GEOS-ESM#319)
  Towards ensemble hofx support (GEOS-ESM#298)
  Change Jedi Log plot and turn off Jb evaluation (GEOS-ESM#310)
  passed benchmark change (GEOS-ESM#303)
  Use `EXPLICIT_DIFFUSION` as Static Background for `geos_marine` (GEOS-ESM#301)
  Fix to check for missing obs in SaveObsDiag (GEOS-ESM#299)
  Cloning GEOS_mksi instead for GSI channel records (GEOS-ESM#297)
  Update modules and keep static files in shared locations (GEOS-ESM#296)
  Addressing missing observations (GEOS-ESM#286)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

missing observations require modifying experiment.yaml
2 participants