Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Arcade SDK #2053

Open
7 of 74 tasks
jcagme opened this issue Feb 19, 2019 · 5 comments
Open
7 of 74 tasks

Arcade SDK #2053

jcagme opened this issue Feb 19, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@jcagme
Copy link
Contributor

jcagme commented Feb 19, 2019

Holding bag for issues not meant to be worked on going forward.

Recently Triaged Issues

All issues in this section should be triaged by the v-team into one of their business objectives or features.

@jcagme jcagme added the Epic label Feb 19, 2019
@markwilkie markwilkie changed the title Arcade SDk post-Dev16 Arcade SDK for post Go Live (P7+) Mar 19, 2019
@markwilkie markwilkie changed the title Arcade SDK for post Go Live (P7+) Arcade SDK Apr 6, 2020
@ChadNedzlek
Copy link
Member

If this epic is for stuff "not meant to be worked on"... what is this epic for? Would we ever prioritize this? Should we close it (and all the issues in it)? @markwilkie @Chrisboh @shawnro

@ChadNedzlek
Copy link
Member

It sort of feels like it might be the tech-debt pit for arcade. Maybe we could/should morph it in to that?

@markwilkie
Copy link
Member

I think the basic idea is that there's a bunch of stuff we could/should do with the Arcade SDK. On the one hand this epic is a "grab bag" of things that others could contribute. Also, at some point it'll likely be a business priority to focus on Arcade again. At that time, it'll be important to triage these issues (again) to get the priority.

It is true though, the longer these issues go w/o needing to be addressed, the less likely they are to be addressed ever says history.

@ChadNedzlek
Copy link
Member

There are some impressive ones in here, including arcade#17. There are some things hiding in here that haven't had a comment since 2018. I'm a bit worried when we actually look at them, no one is going to understand the context from so long ago (also makes the epic sort of hard to judge... what is it when it comes to triaging things into/out-of it).

@markwilkie
Copy link
Member

I'm a bit worried when we actually look at them, no one is going to understand the context from so long ago (also makes the epic sort of hard to judge...

Yea, you're undoubtably right. In a "perfect" world, the Arcade guardian group would triage this epic soon. Also, as I look at the comparative priorities, I don't realistically see that happening in the next short while.

Interestingly enough, I think #6560 has looked in this epic for issues related to native builds which does help justify keeping the issues around. As specific business priorities come up, we can look at this epic for what we thought we wanted to do in the past.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants