Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Status of testing Providers that were prepared on February 21, 2025 #46973

Closed
eladkal opened this issue Feb 21, 2025 · 33 comments
Closed

Status of testing Providers that were prepared on February 21, 2025 #46973

eladkal opened this issue Feb 21, 2025 · 33 comments
Labels
area:providers kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases

Comments

@eladkal
Copy link
Contributor

eladkal commented Feb 21, 2025 •
edited by potiuk
Loading

Body

I have a kind request for all the contributors to the latest provider packages release.
Could you please help us to test the RC versions of the providers?

The guidelines on how to test providers can be found in

Verify providers by contributors

Let us know in the comments, whether the issue is addressed.

These are providers that require testing as there were some substantial changes introduced:

Provider amazon: 9.4.0rc1

Provider apache.beam: 6.0.2rc1

Provider apache.hive: 9.0.2rc1

Provider apache.livy: 4.2.0rc1

Provider celery: 3.10.2rc1

Provider cncf.kubernetes: 10.3.0rc1

Provider cohere: 1.4.2rc1

Provider common.compat: 1.5.0rc1

Provider common.sql: 1.23.0rc1

Provider databricks: 7.2.0rc1

Provider dbt.cloud: 4.2.0rc1

Provider docker: 4.2.0rc1

Provider elasticsearch: 6.2.0rc1

Provider exasol: 4.7.2rc1

Provider google: 14.0.0rc1

Provider http: 5.2.0rc1

Provider microsoft.azure: 12.2.0rc1

Provider microsoft.mssql: 4.2.0rc1

Provider microsoft.winrm: 3.9.0rc1

Provider mongo: 5.0.1rc1

Provider mysql: 6.1.0rc1

Provider openlineage: 2.1.0rc1

Provider opensearch: 1.6.1rc1

Provider pagerduty: 4.0.1rc1

Provider papermill: 3.9.1rc1

Provider postgres: 6.1.0rc1

Provider presto: 5.8.1rc1

Provider redis: 4.0.1rc1

Provider salesforce: 5.10.0rc1

Provider sftp: 5.1.0rc1

Provider smtp: 2.0.0rc1

Provider snowflake: 6.1.0rc1

Provider sqlite: 4.0.0rc1

Provider ssh: 4.0.0rc1

Provider standard: 0.1.0rc1

Provider trino: 6.0.1rc1

Provider weaviate: 3.0.1rc1

All users involved in the PRs:
@lendle @darkag @o-nikolas @perry2of5 @amoghrajesh @SuccessMoses @joellabes @MaksYermak @kanagaraj-dhanapal-89 @vatsrahul1001 @plutaniano @kacpermuda @potiuk @chenkovsky @phi-friday @olegkachur-e @kunal

Committer

  • I acknowledge that I am a maintainer/committer of the Apache Airflow project.
@eladkal eladkal added kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases labels Feb 21, 2025
@insomnes
Copy link
Contributor

insomnes commented Feb 21, 2025 •
edited
Loading

I can see a strange artifact in Pypi docs string for various providers on this release which was not present in previous releases:

Screenshots

Image

Image

Image

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Feb 21, 2025

I can see a strange artifact in Pypi docs string for various providers on this release which was not present in previous releases:

Let me take a look at that -> likely some template artifact. Probably not a blocker for the release, but would be nice to fix

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Feb 21, 2025

I can see a strange artifact in Pypi docs string for various providers on this release which was not present in previous releases:

Likely fix here: #46975 - it will not help with the currently released packages (the "final" canidates are already prepared as well - and those are the ones we vote on in SVN - but should likely help in the future.

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Feb 21, 2025

I updated the issue with a small hack that includes all providers

@raphaelauv
Copy link
Contributor

tested #45571 , it works 👍

@amoghrajesh
Copy link
Contributor

Tested the following issues:

The ones with testing impact:

No testing impact but rather to fix CI

All of them work as expected.

@hardeybisey
Copy link
Contributor

hardeybisey commented Feb 22, 2025 •
edited
Loading

#44960 works fine 👍

@simonprydden
Copy link
Contributor

Was about to check the Asana provider change, but I can't see it in the list now.

Image

@simonprydden
Copy link
Contributor

#46553 example dag works fine. 👍

@nrobinson-intelycare
Copy link
Contributor

#45660 works!

Image

@phi-friday
Copy link
Contributor

#46643 it works fine.

@gopidesupavan
Copy link
Member

Verified these changes are related CI #45442 #46947 #46953

@eladkal
Copy link
Contributor Author

eladkal commented Feb 23, 2025

maintainers / triage team - please also check the boxes for tested items

@gopidesupavan
Copy link
Member

maintainers / triage team - please also check the boxes for tested items

oh i clicked it, somehow not applied 🤔

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Feb 23, 2025

Checked all my changes . Looks good !

@ginone
Copy link
Contributor

ginone commented Feb 24, 2025

Provider dbt.cloud: 4.2.0rc1

Tested with breeze, works as expected!

@darkag
Copy link
Contributor

darkag commented Feb 24, 2025

Provider microsoft.winrm: 3.9.0rc1

#46534

works as expected

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Feb 24, 2025

Tested the following issues:

The ones with testing impact:

@amoghrajesh -> I "clicked" all yours too :)

@simonprydden
Copy link
Contributor

@potiuk / @eladkal The Asana Provider is missing from the 1st message, it was in the original message.

@dabla
Copy link
Contributor

dabla commented Feb 24, 2025

All following PR are working as expected:

This PR is also working but needs an additional patch to make the field_multi_value_leniency parameter working, will open a PR for that:

@brouberol
Copy link
Contributor

Render a pod spec using the pod_template_file override, if passed to the executor works well in apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes==10.3.0rc1 👍

@jcrobak
Copy link
Contributor

jcrobak commented Feb 24, 2025

#46476 for "Provider snowflake: 6.1.0rc1" works as expected. ✅

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Feb 24, 2025 •
edited
Loading

@potiuk / @eladkal The Asana Provider is missing from the 1st message, it was in the original message.

Feel free to test and report it regardless @simonprydden . This relase was a bit difficult (and manual) because of a bug found in the releae process, but there is nothing preventing you to test the rc - I think the only "real" change was yours #46553 and you can install the provider from https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-asana/2.9.0rc1/

@simonprydden
Copy link
Contributor

@potiuk / @eladkal The Asana Provider is missing from the 1st message, it was in the original message.

Feel free to test and report it regardless @simonprydden . This relase was a bit difficult (and manual) because of a bug found in the releae process, but there is nothing preventing you to test the rc - I think the only "real" change was yours #46553 and you can install the provider from https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-asana/2.9.0rc1/

@potiuk I've tested it and works fine, just wanted to make sure it's not missed, as it's not listed on #46973 (comment) now

@MaksYermak
Copy link
Contributor

#46678 and #45023 for apache-airflow-providers-apache-beam==6.0.2rc1 work as expected

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Feb 24, 2025

@potiuk I've tested it and works fine, just wanted to make sure it's not missed, as it's not listed on #46973 (comment) now

Cool. No. Not forgotten - we just manually generated/updated the issue content and like it's been removed from the description accidentally.

@olegkachur-e
Copy link
Contributor

Changes

for apache-airflow-providers-google 14.0.0rc1 work as expected.

@VladaZakharova
Copy link
Contributor

hi!
All my changes work as expected. Thank you!

@MaksYermak
Copy link
Contributor

My changes

for apache-airflow-providers-google==14.0.0rc1 work as expected.

@ramitkataria
Copy link
Contributor

Tested #46579, looks good!

@insomnes
Copy link
Contributor

@lendle
Copy link
Contributor

lendle commented Feb 25, 2025

#46299 is just a documentation change. I'm not sure how to verify it -- are pre-release docs hosted somewhere? I tried building it locally following the steps here but was not successful.

@eladkal
Copy link
Contributor Author

eladkal commented Feb 26, 2025

Thank you everyone. Providers are released.

I invite everyone to help improve providers for the next release, a list of open issues can be found here.

@eladkal eladkal closed this as completed Feb 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area:providers kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests